André Duqum

So... Yes.

I agree.

What is the utility in agreeing with something you fundamentally think is actually incorrect?

Is there a third option?

Is there a third option?

Instead of, I suppose, agreeing with what you very well may think is an illusion, which could be your own, or judging somebody for having an opinion.

Like, yeah, I guess I'm just questioning the...

I guess it depends how zoomed out are you?

Are you thinking we live in a multiverse where all timelines are possible?

And from that perspective, whatever you're saying could be true, then great, whatever.

And I think at the very least, like,

there's also this pattern interrupt when somebody's used to being met with resistance instead of you just like, you just like look the same way they are.

You're like, yeah, okay.

Yeah, totally.

It invites you in to have an actual discussion which can actually make progress.

Yes.

So I think there's definitely value there.

I don't think you can ever understand something and judge it at the same time.

So like I try to bring that into as many encounters and, you know, conversations as possible because then you're just open to actually meeting somebody where they're at instead of their ideas of who they are, what they are.

Yes.