Andy Halliday

And I think the answer is being shown pretty clearly that there are dramatic advances in efficiency and productivity that are available in the technology sector for sure.

And we've seen some reports to cover that.

But for just the general companies that you work with, for example, at Zero60, those are not technology companies by and large.

They're non-tech companies.

Those companies aren't necessarily seeing a lot of benefit with a few exceptions.

Like I think you've given us many examples of where you've been able to automate processes to dramatic effect inside some of those companies.

But there's a vendor in the space called Miro, and I'm not even clear what Miro offers, but they commissioned a Forrester survey of enterprise.

And here's some interesting outcomes from that Forrester research.

And I don't have access to the research, but I have access to these takeaways that they promoted on the Miro site.

First of all, 75% of these enterprise leaders feel that current AI tools focus too much on individual productivity rather than collaborative team outcomes, and that creates silos and hurts coordination in their teams.

Now, they might be responding to a survey question that was phrased in such a way as to get them to agree with it, that there's 75% believe that

Yes, we're able to implement AI to the benefit of an individual contributor.

If I were in that company, because I'm an AI-fluent person, I would be more productive than somebody who's not using AI.

We see that.

That's obvious.

But where are the tools that use AI in a collaborative team context?

And we're getting there, I believe, with agents.

where agents will soon rise to the level where they are an active member of the team and are acting to facilitate the coordination and collaboration among all the human team members as well.

So I believe that that's happening.

The second one is that 70% agreed with the premise that