Andy Halliday

But this seems to be the theme now, right, Andy?

Yeah, I saw that.

Which I, by the one quick note on that, I did read that there was some pushback about the scoring criteria of R3 because it's like, if I remember right, the issue was if it was,

If it fails one part, it fails all of it, which is why those percentages are very, very low, less than 1%.

And so there was some pushback against that.

Yeah.

And so what I was going to say, the other point to that was, you know, this, you know, just Wong talked about it.

We talked about everybody's talking about AGI, but that's really what we're starting to see evolve.

AGI will be, you can call it the harness.

I will call it sort of that classic MCP to A to A, you know, sort of set up where you do have very, very good.

either agents or maybe it's an agent plus lots of sub agents that are very, very good, like composer two at specific tasks.

But sure.

And Greg is kind of making the point in the comments that like, you know, do we really want these silos?

Well, I would say there's nothing wrong with

that agents and sub-agents having that specific skills.

Now imagine there are 50 other agents that have 50 other abilities in other areas.

Maybe it's all in the same vertical, maybe we're breaking out of the vertical.

That's when I really start to think you look at probably industry and maybe earlier than that sub-industry AGI.

Where the consensus, the general consensus, because there is no like nobody gets a prize per se to it.

But the general consensus of experts in that maybe even sub industry, just to keep it a little bit more niche, are going to say, yeah, you know what?