Anish Acharya

Does OpenAI have the sort of

prioritization, the resources, and the ambition in that direction to build all the feature surface around the primitive.

prioritization, the resources, and the ambition in that direction to build all the feature surface around the primitive.

So I think the models will often actually recreate the primitive and even do product marketing, which I think the Claude legal stuff was.

So I think the models will often actually recreate the primitive and even do product marketing, which I think the Claude legal stuff was.

But if you have a market that demands a lot of feature surface, I just think the model companies are less set up to prioritize it.

But if you have a market that demands a lot of feature surface, I just think the model companies are less set up to prioritize it.

Perhaps.

Perhaps.

I just think that the model companies have ambitions in so many directions that it is hard for them to prioritize building opinionated UIs for the legal community.

I just think that the model companies have ambitions in so many directions that it is hard for them to prioritize building opinionated UIs for the legal community.

I also think in many of these categories, again, being multi-model is important.

I also think in many of these categories, again, being multi-model is important.

And OpenAI is only going to ever give you OpenAI models, right?

And OpenAI is only going to ever give you OpenAI models, right?

Anthropix is only going to give you their models.

Anthropix is only going to give you their models.

Same with Google.

Same with Google.

So if you are multi-model, rich feature surface, I think being an apps company is better.