Annaka Harris

Well... No, it's not.

He's saying something more than that.

But my point is that a lot of what he's already saying, on some level, science is already there and could agree with.

Yeah.

Yes, although I think we already know that as well.

I mean, if any version of string theory is correct, and of course we don't know yet, it's all up for grabs, but the truth is each theory is weirder than the last.

If there are 15 dimensions of space, we are just not...

not wired to be able to understand the fundamental reality.

Yes, and he's not just saying that we really only have this tiny window onto reality.

He's saying that that window onto reality

is giving us a lot of false information.

So what he will agree, so what I would say to that, and when I've posed this to him, I really don't wanna speak for him, but I'll answer it myself and say that I believe he agrees with what I'm about to say, which is that the things we perceive

are connected to the structure of reality.

It's just that the structure of reality is made of something completely different than the thing we're experiencing.

So imagine, if you just go with the holographic principle, loosely, and actually the holographic principle applies to black holes only.

So there's ADS,

CFT duality, anti-de Sitter space and conformal field theory.

Am I getting all these terms right?

Well, I mean, this is where I've gone in all of my conversations with physicists because the idea is, so if we just have the basic principle that reality and all of the information can be contained or is actually in a two-dimensional space that gets projected, this is something that you don't buy based on the look on your face.

Right.