Annie Jacobsen

My daughter, if I take two steps, she knows it's me.

That's human intelligence versus where machine intelligence is.

The difference is this.

With the biometrics, the offset technology of biometrics that can see you from far away and identify you, it's looking at you, grabbing a metric like your iris scans that it already has in a computer system from you going in and out of the airport or wherever it happened to have captured your biometrics.

And it's matching it against a system of systems.

But the human knows intuitively who the person is across the field without having – they have their own internal.

So the metaphor is the same.

But do you see what I'm saying?

The human didn't have to look up in a computer, you know, fact check or rather biometric check.

So it's still machine learning.

Even the offset biometrics that are seeing you from far away.

And isn't his new book, which I haven't read yet, like we're basically almost there?

He puts it at four years?

Which is another endlessly interesting, tragic thought that I think about a lot is how we humans go.

Meanwhile, your AI is just getting smarter and smarter and smarter infinitely, including in terms of time.

And we just deteriorate.

Those pictures of them that are like several hundred years old?

I didn't know that.

This is that conundrum of the dual-use technology of the military because most of these technologies begin on DARPA grants.

And then they – you know, the limb regeneration.