Annie Karni

She wants to get into it with the most famous House Democrat. And usually AOC does not take the bait. But in this clip, you can hear she gets to her. She takes the bait. She gets into a heated back and forth with Greene, which is kind of what Greene wants here.

She wants to get into it with the most famous House Democrat. And usually AOC does not take the bait. But in this clip, you can hear she gets to her. She takes the bait. She gets into a heated back and forth with Greene, which is kind of what Greene wants here.

Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah.

Right. And, you know, whether going lower is an improvement or not is a matter of opinion. Whether this was like a great moment for Democrats or not is really a matter of opinion. But usually when things go viral online, it's not a great sign for the functionality of Congress. And, you know, in this case, no one even remembered what the hearing was ostensibly about.

Right. And, you know, whether going lower is an improvement or not is a matter of opinion. Whether this was like a great moment for Democrats or not is really a matter of opinion. But usually when things go viral online, it's not a great sign for the functionality of Congress. And, you know, in this case, no one even remembered what the hearing was ostensibly about.

Right. And, you know, whether going lower is an improvement or not is a matter of opinion. Whether this was like a great moment for Democrats or not is really a matter of opinion. But usually when things go viral online, it's not a great sign for the functionality of Congress. And, you know, in this case, no one even remembered what the hearing was ostensibly about.

You had Tim Burchett and Patrick McHenry on the floor. A lot of it is Republican on Republican, not just intraparty. Yes.

You had Tim Burchett and Patrick McHenry on the floor. A lot of it is Republican on Republican, not just intraparty. Yes.

You had Tim Burchett and Patrick McHenry on the floor. A lot of it is Republican on Republican, not just intraparty. Yes.

We did. I think that along the way, I found reporting the book a great help to my day job writing about Congress for The New York Times. I got a lot of daily stories out of book reporting. But you can also – You're doing interviews under embargo. So people are willing to tell you things that they wouldn't tell you for the daily paper when you say this is not for use until March 2025.

We did. I think that along the way, I found reporting the book a great help to my day job writing about Congress for The New York Times. I got a lot of daily stories out of book reporting. But you can also – You're doing interviews under embargo. So people are willing to tell you things that they wouldn't tell you for the daily paper when you say this is not for use until March 2025.

We did. I think that along the way, I found reporting the book a great help to my day job writing about Congress for The New York Times. I got a lot of daily stories out of book reporting. But you can also – You're doing interviews under embargo. So people are willing to tell you things that they wouldn't tell you for the daily paper when you say this is not for use until March 2025.

So I think that criticism, I understand why it's made, but... And it's not really fair. A lot of stuff isn't available in real time. And I think it's valuable to have it out eventually for history, for understanding the moment better. But it's just simply not available to use in real time. So would you rather have it never or would you rather have it later? And the book is the later.

So I think that criticism, I understand why it's made, but... And it's not really fair. A lot of stuff isn't available in real time. And I think it's valuable to have it out eventually for history, for understanding the moment better. But it's just simply not available to use in real time. So would you rather have it never or would you rather have it later? And the book is the later.

So I think that criticism, I understand why it's made, but... And it's not really fair. A lot of stuff isn't available in real time. And I think it's valuable to have it out eventually for history, for understanding the moment better. But it's just simply not available to use in real time. So would you rather have it never or would you rather have it later? And the book is the later.

So sometimes we would be able to peel off stuff and ask sources, is it OK if I use this now? But the agreement when you do these interviews is that it's embargoed for the book. And you can't really violate that agreement.

So sometimes we would be able to peel off stuff and ask sources, is it OK if I use this now? But the agreement when you do these interviews is that it's embargoed for the book. And you can't really violate that agreement.

So sometimes we would be able to peel off stuff and ask sources, is it OK if I use this now? But the agreement when you do these interviews is that it's embargoed for the book. And you can't really violate that agreement.