Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

Today, we're taking a look at court experts, the back and forth over naming victims, the OJ jury questionnaires, and our Elsewhere in the Diddyverse, which is Busby, the Texan attorney who's filing civil cases for multiple alleged victims of Diddy. He's now going up against another high-profile name, the controversial social media figure, Andrew Tate.

Joining me today is our resident criminal defense attorney, Sean Kent. Hi, Sean.

Joining me today is our resident criminal defense attorney, Sean Kent. Hi, Sean.

Joining me today is our resident criminal defense attorney, Sean Kent. Hi, Sean.

Sean, I'm looking at this docket every day. They are filing back and forth, right? One thing that stood out that I don't think we've spoken on the podcast before about is court experts.

Sean, I'm looking at this docket every day. They are filing back and forth, right? One thing that stood out that I don't think we've spoken on the podcast before about is court experts.

Sean, I'm looking at this docket every day. They are filing back and forth, right? One thing that stood out that I don't think we've spoken on the podcast before about is court experts.

At first I read this and I thought it meant people who had expert knowledge of being in court, but it became clearer that they are, it's kind of when they bring people in with a specialty in one of the areas they're discussing, right? Can you bring a court expert in about Anything at all? Or is there specific areas you have to pick from?

At first I read this and I thought it meant people who had expert knowledge of being in court, but it became clearer that they are, it's kind of when they bring people in with a specialty in one of the areas they're discussing, right? Can you bring a court expert in about Anything at all? Or is there specific areas you have to pick from?

At first I read this and I thought it meant people who had expert knowledge of being in court, but it became clearer that they are, it's kind of when they bring people in with a specialty in one of the areas they're discussing, right? Can you bring a court expert in about Anything at all? Or is there specific areas you have to pick from?

So immediately the question is, if the defense are bringing their own court experts and the prosecution are bringing their own court experts, who pays them?

So immediately the question is, if the defense are bringing their own court experts and the prosecution are bringing their own court experts, who pays them?

So immediately the question is, if the defense are bringing their own court experts and the prosecution are bringing their own court experts, who pays them?

So if you're being employed by one side versus employed by another side, isn't there the possibility for expertise to be bought?

So if you're being employed by one side versus employed by another side, isn't there the possibility for expertise to be bought?

So if you're being employed by one side versus employed by another side, isn't there the possibility for expertise to be bought?

And then Diddy's defense can bat that exact same argument back against any experts the prosecution brings. So what, it becomes like a credibility tennis match? And then the other thing that I keep seeing is this phrase rebuttal experts that kept popping up in different filings. I think in this case, the prosecution were talking about wanting a sex trafficking expert.

And then Diddy's defense can bat that exact same argument back against any experts the prosecution brings. So what, it becomes like a credibility tennis match? And then the other thing that I keep seeing is this phrase rebuttal experts that kept popping up in different filings. I think in this case, the prosecution were talking about wanting a sex trafficking expert.

And then Diddy's defense can bat that exact same argument back against any experts the prosecution brings. So what, it becomes like a credibility tennis match? And then the other thing that I keep seeing is this phrase rebuttal experts that kept popping up in different filings. I think in this case, the prosecution were talking about wanting a sex trafficking expert.

So then the defense has a right to bring their own rebuttal sex trafficking expert.