Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

So then the defense has a right to bring their own rebuttal sex trafficking expert.

So then the defense has a right to bring their own rebuttal sex trafficking expert.

Who has the time for this? Surely this is extremely time-consuming in a trial that already we have, as you said, terabytes of information to get through, of discovery material to get through. Back and forth, he said, she said, with experts. That's unnecessary, right? Or that makes the whole process much harder?

Who has the time for this? Surely this is extremely time-consuming in a trial that already we have, as you said, terabytes of information to get through, of discovery material to get through. Back and forth, he said, she said, with experts. That's unnecessary, right? Or that makes the whole process much harder?

Who has the time for this? Surely this is extremely time-consuming in a trial that already we have, as you said, terabytes of information to get through, of discovery material to get through. Back and forth, he said, she said, with experts. That's unnecessary, right? Or that makes the whole process much harder?

So like you've referenced there, you've referenced DNA and murder and even sex trafficking experts. It feels far more tangible. Sometimes you get experts talking about things or research that they've done on areas that are still evolving and we're still learning things about. I'm thinking here in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

So like you've referenced there, you've referenced DNA and murder and even sex trafficking experts. It feels far more tangible. Sometimes you get experts talking about things or research that they've done on areas that are still evolving and we're still learning things about. I'm thinking here in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

So like you've referenced there, you've referenced DNA and murder and even sex trafficking experts. It feels far more tangible. Sometimes you get experts talking about things or research that they've done on areas that are still evolving and we're still learning things about. I'm thinking here in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

A false memory expert took the stand and spoke about, you know, traumatic memories sometimes being influenced by media and a memory isn't something you retrieve, it's something that you sort of recompose and it can be influenced by many things. But they can make a massive impact.

A false memory expert took the stand and spoke about, you know, traumatic memories sometimes being influenced by media and a memory isn't something you retrieve, it's something that you sort of recompose and it can be influenced by many things. But they can make a massive impact.

A false memory expert took the stand and spoke about, you know, traumatic memories sometimes being influenced by media and a memory isn't something you retrieve, it's something that you sort of recompose and it can be influenced by many things. But they can make a massive impact.

I mean, they can change the course of a trial if they're a particularly compelling expert and if they can go through things in meticulous detail.

I mean, they can change the course of a trial if they're a particularly compelling expert and if they can go through things in meticulous detail.

I mean, they can change the course of a trial if they're a particularly compelling expert and if they can go through things in meticulous detail.

In the OJ trial, so the massive NFL player where he was accused of murdering his ex-wife and her friend, the expert that came in, Dr. Henry Lee, and spoke about blood spattering patterns and DNA and forensics, he did it in such meticulous detail that a lot of people said they felt that it sort of turned the tides.

In the OJ trial, so the massive NFL player where he was accused of murdering his ex-wife and her friend, the expert that came in, Dr. Henry Lee, and spoke about blood spattering patterns and DNA and forensics, he did it in such meticulous detail that a lot of people said they felt that it sort of turned the tides.

In the OJ trial, so the massive NFL player where he was accused of murdering his ex-wife and her friend, the expert that came in, Dr. Henry Lee, and spoke about blood spattering patterns and DNA and forensics, he did it in such meticulous detail that a lot of people said they felt that it sort of turned the tides.

Now it's time for Elsewhere in the Diddyverse. Tony Busby, our Texan lawyer who claims to have over 150 victims that he could bring to court against the rapper P. Diddy, has filed a lawsuit against another high-profile defendant, this time controversial social media figure Andrew Tate.

Now it's time for Elsewhere in the Diddyverse. Tony Busby, our Texan lawyer who claims to have over 150 victims that he could bring to court against the rapper P. Diddy, has filed a lawsuit against another high-profile defendant, this time controversial social media figure Andrew Tate.

Now it's time for Elsewhere in the Diddyverse. Tony Busby, our Texan lawyer who claims to have over 150 victims that he could bring to court against the rapper P. Diddy, has filed a lawsuit against another high-profile defendant, this time controversial social media figure Andrew Tate.