Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty

If you don't know Andrew Tate, he's a self-proclaimed misogynist with over 10 million followers on X. Busby is representing Tate's ex-girlfriend, Brianna Stern, who has claimed that he physically assaulted her and verbally abused her. In a statement to the BBC, Andrew Tate's attorney, Joseph McBride, dismissed the allegations and called the lawsuit a blatant cash grab.

If you don't know Andrew Tate, he's a self-proclaimed misogynist with over 10 million followers on X. Busby is representing Tate's ex-girlfriend, Brianna Stern, who has claimed that he physically assaulted her and verbally abused her. In a statement to the BBC, Andrew Tate's attorney, Joseph McBride, dismissed the allegations and called the lawsuit a blatant cash grab.

If you don't know Andrew Tate, he's a self-proclaimed misogynist with over 10 million followers on X. Busby is representing Tate's ex-girlfriend, Brianna Stern, who has claimed that he physically assaulted her and verbally abused her. In a statement to the BBC, Andrew Tate's attorney, Joseph McBride, dismissed the allegations and called the lawsuit a blatant cash grab.

And the spotlight was back on Tony Busby as Mr McBride also attacked him, calling him a low-life bottom feeder. In a statement to the BBC, Busby said he's extremely proud to represent Brianna Stern. He also posted on Instagram saying, quote, And he claims that people were saying it's her own fault. That's Brianna's own fault for dating Andrew Tate. She should have known better.

And the spotlight was back on Tony Busby as Mr McBride also attacked him, calling him a low-life bottom feeder. In a statement to the BBC, Busby said he's extremely proud to represent Brianna Stern. He also posted on Instagram saying, quote, And he claims that people were saying it's her own fault. That's Brianna's own fault for dating Andrew Tate. She should have known better.

And the spotlight was back on Tony Busby as Mr McBride also attacked him, calling him a low-life bottom feeder. In a statement to the BBC, Busby said he's extremely proud to represent Brianna Stern. He also posted on Instagram saying, quote, And he claims that people were saying it's her own fault. That's Brianna's own fault for dating Andrew Tate. She should have known better.

Busby's caption was accompanied by screenshots of alleged text messages from Andrew Tate to Brianna Stern, where he refers to her as Pookie Pumpkin Princess and sends her romantic, seemingly self-composed poems. Andrew Tate's attorney told the BBC these messages were doctored, edited and falsified. None of it is true. And he added on,

Busby's caption was accompanied by screenshots of alleged text messages from Andrew Tate to Brianna Stern, where he refers to her as Pookie Pumpkin Princess and sends her romantic, seemingly self-composed poems. Andrew Tate's attorney told the BBC these messages were doctored, edited and falsified. None of it is true. And he added on,

Busby's caption was accompanied by screenshots of alleged text messages from Andrew Tate to Brianna Stern, where he refers to her as Pookie Pumpkin Princess and sends her romantic, seemingly self-composed poems. Andrew Tate's attorney told the BBC these messages were doctored, edited and falsified. None of it is true. And he added on,

So we've just been talking about court experts, but it's not just court experts where there are updates. There's also some news on the jury front. I saw that they are saying that the jury is going to be sequestered when they receive their jury questionnaires and they go through and they strike people out. So Sean, if they're sequestered, does that mean they all live in a house together or a hotel?

So we've just been talking about court experts, but it's not just court experts where there are updates. There's also some news on the jury front. I saw that they are saying that the jury is going to be sequestered when they receive their jury questionnaires and they go through and they strike people out. So Sean, if they're sequestered, does that mean they all live in a house together or a hotel?

So we've just been talking about court experts, but it's not just court experts where there are updates. There's also some news on the jury front. I saw that they are saying that the jury is going to be sequestered when they receive their jury questionnaires and they go through and they strike people out. So Sean, if they're sequestered, does that mean they all live in a house together or a hotel?

Right. So they've got these jury questionnaires that they are going to meet up about on April 11th, meet and confer and come up with the questions. And then they're going to get 600 of them. They're going to be printed and distributed 28th, 29th, 30th of April and get the answers back. Then they've got these four lists that they present. Prospective jurists that both sides agree should be excused.

Right. So they've got these jury questionnaires that they are going to meet up about on April 11th, meet and confer and come up with the questions. And then they're going to get 600 of them. They're going to be printed and distributed 28th, 29th, 30th of April and get the answers back. Then they've got these four lists that they present. Prospective jurists that both sides agree should be excused.

Right. So they've got these jury questionnaires that they are going to meet up about on April 11th, meet and confer and come up with the questions. And then they're going to get 600 of them. They're going to be printed and distributed 28th, 29th, 30th of April and get the answers back. Then they've got these four lists that they present. Prospective jurists that both sides agree should be excused.

And then ones that the defence but not the government want and ones that the government but not the defence want. How do you then come to sort of a coherent understanding of who's going to be your jurors?

And then ones that the defence but not the government want and ones that the government but not the defence want. How do you then come to sort of a coherent understanding of who's going to be your jurors?

And then ones that the defence but not the government want and ones that the government but not the defence want. How do you then come to sort of a coherent understanding of who's going to be your jurors?

Do you say race neutral? It has to be race neutral. Not gender neutral?

Do you say race neutral? It has to be race neutral. Not gender neutral?