Anoushka Mutanda-Doughty

Tämä tapahtuu globaalissa taustalla, koska hän meni reality-tv-kirjassa, jossa hän olisi bacheloretta, jotta hän löytäisi uuden tyyppiä, mahdollisimman ison. Me olemme järjestäneet sitä järjestelmää, jota heillä on tiettynä tilannetta, mutta siinä on myös yritysten osaamista. Disney on investoinut paljon rahaa tuohon jaksoon.

Now, of course, we did ask Disney for a comment, and they haven't replied. They haven't spoken specifically about their vetting process, but they have released a statement saying, quote, In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family. And I just want to quickly check with you when I'm thinking about who can sue, because I spend a lot of time with you talking about who can sue, and in America the answer is usually...

Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki! Kaikki!

Oh Sean, it's nice having you back. Thank you for walking us through all of that. There was some new ground we covered there. We haven't done a lot of that before. Because you're a legal nerd, honey. I am a dork and you know I get excited about this type of stuff. Sean, thank you so much for coming and breaking that down for us. Thank you Anushka for having me. You are appreciated.

Se oli meidän asiantuntijamme Sean Kent Suomesta, mutta ennen kuin menemme, on jotain jännittävää. BBC laittaa keinoja Maida Vale Studiosin keskusteluun keskusteluun 5.5. keskusteluun. Yksi päivä julkaiseminen, joka saa meidän suurimmat uudistuspodcastit sinulle. Ja Fame Under Fire on siellä.

As well as Newscast, AmeriCast, The Global Story and Top Comment. You'll be able to go behind the scenes, meet your favorite hosts, join exclusive Q&As and even step into the studio to record your own mini podcast episode. Tickets are free, just head to the BBC shows and tours website. And that's it for this episode of Fame Under Fire from BBC Sounds with me, Anushka Matanda-Doughty. Make sure you subscribe and turn on those push notifications so you never miss a thing.

Hello and welcome back to Fame Under Fire from BBC Sounds with me, Anushka Matanda-Doughty. Now, two very famous celebrities clad in matching tones of olive green entered the Daniel Mahoinihan courtroom in Southern District of New York. Now, if that name sounds really familiar, that is where the Diddy trial was. What followed was hours and hours of Blake Lively's and Justin Baldonis' camp desperately seeking a settlement. What on earth is going on? But before we jump in, just a warning, this episode does contain some strong language.

Kiitos, että katsoitte.

Ja se tuli paljon aikaa, mutta resta Seanin aikaa hän on suunnittelemaan suurta tulevaisuutta Yhdysvalloissa. Olen tullut! Olen tullut! Olen tullut! Olen niin iloinen! Hän on CrossWired-podcast-festivalissa. Teemme live-kirjoituksen. Olen hieman nervoissani laittamaan tämän miehen live-huoneeseen.

Niin myös julkaisijat ja koko BBC. Hän on täällä katsomassa ja oppimaan enemmän tästä maasta kuin vain Paddington ja Benny Hill, jotka näyttävät olevan hänen yksiänsä. Ja Marmalade. Ja luulen, että Marmalade tuli Paddingtonista, joten se on kaikki. Ja Mind the Gap. Ne ovat asioita, joita tiedän.

We've got great cultural exports. We really are a powerhouse on the global stage. But today, Sean, this really is one of your expertise. We're talking about court-mandated mediation. Sounds like legalese there. But we had Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni together inside the Southern District of New York courthouse trying to figure this out.

Lähtökohtaisesti Justin Baldonin, Jamie Heath, Wayfarer Studio ja muut suomalaiset suomalaiset suomalaiset suomalaiset suomalaiset

What about in this case where we've got Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively engaged in this over a year long bitter court battle, but she alleges she was the victim of sexual harassment. He alleges that she's accusing him of something so heinous to ruin his reputation. Are you going to make them sit in the same room for hours on end to sort this out?

No, you said that that's very interesting, that they can't bring up anything at trial that was said in mediation. But what if something really outlandish is said that contributes to the point they're trying to make? For instance, in this case, this is just completely theoretical, but if Blake Lively says something abhorrent to Justin Baldoni, and then he brings, he can't say at trial, not only has she subjected me to this, this and this in the press, when we got into the mediation room, she called me a prick.

No you say it mentioned there about getting up on the stand and saying something in front of the jury. I want everyone to cast their minds back to the Diddy trial because Mark Agnifilo introduced a few times within that trial that the jury should start to question why the federal government were going after Sean Diddy Combs. And the question should lead them to the answer that they were attacking a successful African-American man. Now he put that point forwards. But all the judge did was bring the jury back in.

Ja sanovat, että se on epäilyttävä. Vapaa se ylös. Men in black, se on epäilyttävä. Se ei ole robotit. Jos he kuulevat jotain, he kuulevat sen. Miten se toimii?

Turning up at the court-mandated mediation, there was of course tons of press there to capture Blake Lively coming in, Justin Baldoni came in. Now Justin Baldoni came in with his wife, Blake Lively came in alone, and this led to loads of speculation online. Oh my goodness, her husband isn't supporting her anymore, her famous friends have abandoned her. But actually, I'm wondering, is there some legal strategy to her coming in alone, without these names of famous people who she's

Now obviously Blake Lively's side are arguing he was her boss and her co-star, so he had complete power over her on that set. But we've spoken about discovery before. Discovery in this case has been extensive. That's where texts, emails, I mean letters if you're fond of that, can be subpoenaed and entered into the docket as evidence of certain things that were going on to contribute to the argument that either side are making. I'm going to read you some of the messages between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift. I just want you...

Kertoisitko minulle, kuinka huonosti luulet, että Blakella oli yksi pysyvällä? Okei? Okei, olen. Tämä on Blake Livelyn Taylor Swiftin BFF. Hän sanoo, että jos tulet täällä, jossa minun elokuvani tyhjyysjohtaja on edelleen täällä, joten toivon, että hän on edelleen täällä. Voitko auttaa minua? Tarvitsen apua hänelle.

Can you tell him you're excited for the movie, that you read the book, but what you're freaking out over is the pages I sent you? What a magnetic scene that is, or whatever descriptives you're comfortable with. I'll send you the scene, you don't have to read it, of course, it's a quick read. He's a clown and thinks he's a writer now, and got this rewrite and told me he appreciates my passion. That's it, full stop. So having the greatest living storyteller unknowingly echo to him how much you love what we're doing, open brackets, giving him credit as if he wrote them with me,