Anthony Pompliano

Like how much of it is like intent versus do you have to at some point just say like, hey, you cannot use AI, you know, generated images if you're an investor or if you're, you know, participating in the market, like how do you regulate that stuff?

One thing that I always find fascinating as I've met more people kind of in these different regulatory posts, I always like to ask like these technologies, it's very hard to regulate them if you don't use them yourself, but there's obviously limitations in your role.

And so like, I don't know what you've been able to disclose in terms of like, do you own crypto?

Do you not?

Do you use the prediction markets?

Do you get like a debt?

demo account and they're like, hey, we actually want you to try to use this stuff.

Just talk maybe about the different technologies and like how you think about, you know, using them, but also that the fiduciary duties and, you know, disclosures you have to make.

I just won the mention market of you saying crypto, kidding, but no, I'm playing.

But I do think it could even be like a de minimis amount, right?

Like if you go on the prediction market, I don't think anyone's got a problem with $100.

I think it's different when they see politicians or something going and making millions and millions of dollars, right?

Then obviously a little bit different severity standpoint.

You guys have an innovation task force that you recently announced.

Talk about what this is and kind of what your goal with it is.

I think where maybe some innovation is meeting regulation is on clarity and a lot of stable coin yield stuff, et cetera.

And I've heard both sides argument like in pretty in-depth in private meetings.

And what I've told both sides is you're both right.

Like, you know, like they both have a hint of truth to what they're saying.

And that's why they're digging their heels in.