Asena Basak

There's another interesting fact about this case. So apparently in Texas, if you are acquitted of a crime, your complete record can be expunged. Once Renard was acquitted, he did ask for that. So we didn't really have any access to court transcripts, court testimony, which we usually do. to do these kind of programs. So that was a big challenge for us.

There's another interesting fact about this case. So apparently in Texas, if you are acquitted of a crime, your complete record can be expunged. Once Renard was acquitted, he did ask for that. So we didn't really have any access to court transcripts, court testimony, which we usually do. to do these kind of programs. So that was a big challenge for us.

There's another interesting fact about this case. So apparently in Texas, if you are acquitted of a crime, your complete record can be expunged. Once Renard was acquitted, he did ask for that. So we didn't really have any access to court transcripts, court testimony, which we usually do. to do these kind of programs. So that was a big challenge for us.

Yes. So we hear Patricia at 3.01 a.m. when she says it's the same thing over and over again. So there's something going on, like Natalie said, between them. And then 3.07 is when the gunshots are heard. So there's only six minutes. from when we hear Patricia saying it's the same thing over and over again to the gunshot.

Yes. So we hear Patricia at 3.01 a.m. when she says it's the same thing over and over again. So there's something going on, like Natalie said, between them. And then 3.07 is when the gunshots are heard. So there's only six minutes. from when we hear Patricia saying it's the same thing over and over again to the gunshot.

Yes. So we hear Patricia at 3.01 a.m. when she says it's the same thing over and over again. So there's something going on, like Natalie said, between them. And then 3.07 is when the gunshots are heard. So there's only six minutes. from when we hear Patricia saying it's the same thing over and over again to the gunshot.

So the prosecutors at trial raised this by saying you were having a fight with your husband and in six minutes you were able to sleep. That doesn't sound believable.

So the prosecutors at trial raised this by saying you were having a fight with your husband and in six minutes you were able to sleep. That doesn't sound believable.

So the prosecutors at trial raised this by saying you were having a fight with your husband and in six minutes you were able to sleep. That doesn't sound believable.

I mean, it's a complicated case. Consultant Lisa Andrews told us she was a former prosecutor in Texas, and she did tell us that there was just not enough evidence clearly pointing to either side.

I mean, it's a complicated case. Consultant Lisa Andrews told us she was a former prosecutor in Texas, and she did tell us that there was just not enough evidence clearly pointing to either side.

I mean, it's a complicated case. Consultant Lisa Andrews told us she was a former prosecutor in Texas, and she did tell us that there was just not enough evidence clearly pointing to either side.

Dick DeGaran, who was Renard Spivey's attorney, told us that a crime scene technician at trial acknowledged that the trigger was not swabbed for DNA because she was afraid that it would go off again. Now, Dick made a point that shows how dangerous this gun is.

Dick DeGaran, who was Renard Spivey's attorney, told us that a crime scene technician at trial acknowledged that the trigger was not swabbed for DNA because she was afraid that it would go off again. Now, Dick made a point that shows how dangerous this gun is.

Dick DeGaran, who was Renard Spivey's attorney, told us that a crime scene technician at trial acknowledged that the trigger was not swabbed for DNA because she was afraid that it would go off again. Now, Dick made a point that shows how dangerous this gun is.

He also said the DNA swabbing was a bit sloppy, meaning the investigators used only one swab to swab the gun, but they didn't specifically swab the trigger. And when they used one swab to swab the gun, two DNAs came up, which was Patricia and Renard's DNA.

He also said the DNA swabbing was a bit sloppy, meaning the investigators used only one swab to swab the gun, but they didn't specifically swab the trigger. And when they used one swab to swab the gun, two DNAs came up, which was Patricia and Renard's DNA.

He also said the DNA swabbing was a bit sloppy, meaning the investigators used only one swab to swab the gun, but they didn't specifically swab the trigger. And when they used one swab to swab the gun, two DNAs came up, which was Patricia and Renard's DNA.

So Renard told us that he was shot first in the leg. The second shot, according to Renard, hit Patricia on the left side of her chest. And then the third shot would have gone through her arm, exiting her arm and going into her right torso. But the medical examiner can't tell us the order of the shots. So we need to go by accounts of people.

So Renard told us that he was shot first in the leg. The second shot, according to Renard, hit Patricia on the left side of her chest. And then the third shot would have gone through her arm, exiting her arm and going into her right torso. But the medical examiner can't tell us the order of the shots. So we need to go by accounts of people.