Asma Khalid

Researcher detect that these side effects are indeed fairly common. Once that is proven, why do the drugs stay on the market? I mean, presumably I understand that they are helping patients, but there has got to be some sort of tension looking at the pros and cons in that dynamic.

It's hard to compute why if the research was done, you're saying in the early 2000s, why someone like Charlene in the year 2016 was not aware of the risks of the medication she was on, unless that information was not being fully disclosed, right? You say that the risks were known, that they were beginning to be printed on leaflets. How do people continue then to take the drug and not know the side effects?

Particularly when you talk about sexual behavior changes, some folks might be wondering, well, hey, is this just not on me? People do change their sexual behaviors over their life, and is that just not a part of it? Do they wonder, and do they struggle with how much agency they had?

Sanoit, että lääkärit laittavat huomioita lääkäriin. Onko sinun mielestäsi, että on enemmän, joka voi tehdä, jotta nämä lääkärit saadaan turvallisemmin?

Noel, sinä aloitit tutkimaan näitä tapauksia enemmän kuin vuoden aiemmin. Ja kuten sanotaan, sinä olet puhunut montien ihmisten kanssa, montien tapauksien kanssa. Ihmiset ovat edelleen tutustumassa sinuun. Haluan vain kysyä, Noel, mitä olet oppinut? No, se on ollut yllättävän kokemus. Nämä ovat todella vaikeita tarinoita kuulla. Mutta on myös jotain todella järkevää. Kun me publikoimme yhden näiden tarinoiden, me olemme järjestäneet ihmisiä tutustumassa.

Se oli Noel Titheridge, BBC-kysymyksen järjestäjä. Ja Noelin järjestäjien vastauksessa Yhdysvallan saavutusjärjestäjä sanoi, että hän aloittaa tutkimuksen sääntöjä muutaman dopamina-agonistin medikaatioista.

If you appreciated today's show and broadly the type of journalism that we bring you here on The Global Story, where we go in-depth every day on one big story at the intersection of where America and the world meet, then I've got a favor to ask. Could you take a moment to write a review or rate us wherever you listen? It really helps other people find us. And by the way, if you all have questions for us, we love hearing from listeners. We want to know what stories you're interested in hearing.

You can email us at theglobalstory at bbc.com. Today's episode was produced by Viv Jones. It was edited by Bridget Harney and mixed by Travis Evans. Our video producer is Matt Pintis. Our senior news editor is Chyna Collins. And I'm Asma Khalid. Thanks as always for spending some time with us and we'll talk to you again tomorrow.

Hey there, I'm Asma Khalid.

The world order is shifting.

Old alliances are fraying and new ones are emerging.

Some of this turbulence can be traced to decisions made in the United States.

But the US isn't just a cause of the upheaval.

Its politics are also a symptom of it.

So we hope you enjoy this episode.

And to find more of our show, just search for The Global Story wherever you get your BBC podcasts.

You might remember from history class that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 led to the First World War.

But our guest today, an expert on the history of war, says it's a lot more complicated.

It turns out wars often spiral out of control for all sorts of unexpected reasons, sometimes even by accident, miscalculation and pride.

What started just over three weeks ago with the U.S.