Azeem Azhar

Or if you saw the recent essay about the world of spiky minds, that's also sort of reflective of that.

Lots of different models, lots of different capabilities and tones, and the need for us to be able to orchestrate and understand across them if we are actually to be more than individual contributors.

So there's a reality shock here at check here, which is the usage gap.

So at the end of 2025, you know, ChatGPT, alongside everyone else, by the way, launched their sort of year in 2025.

Everyone's aping, aping Spotify.

They released their year in 2025.

If you got one of those, why don't you share some of your highlights from that year in 2025 in the chat?

Because that would be quite interesting, I think.

When you look at that data,

It was quite interesting to see what it took to get to the top 1% of all ChatGPT users.

And I found on Reddit a post that showed that there was a user who had only had 283 chats in the whole year and they got to the top 1%.

Now, one query a day in my mind is not really using AI.

That is not diffusion.

That is experimentation.

That is a bit like my home.

I can tell you we have a fondue set, but it comes out every three or four years.

So I know that in some technical way, we own a fondue set, but we don't really do fondue.

And that gap between fondue set owning AI users and users who've figured out orchestration is now a chasm and is growing really fast.

And I really think it's hard for it to close.

We've started to see how within the mainstream, Gemini from Google is taking up, winning a lot of market share against ChatGPT because that's where the kind of casual person who's going to dip their bread into melted cheese, use AI once or twice,