Bart Sibrel

That's it.

Well, then you need fuel to land on the moon and to leave the moon, which they didn't have. This is why NASA destroyed all the technology. It's one of the clips at Sobrell.com, a NASA engineer saying, we intentionally destroyed all of the moon landing technology. Now, if they were ever going to destroy a technology, you might do that with the atomic bomb, right?

Well, then you need fuel to land on the moon and to leave the moon, which they didn't have. This is why NASA destroyed all the technology. It's one of the clips at Sobrell.com, a NASA engineer saying, we intentionally destroyed all of the moon landing technology. Now, if they were ever going to destroy a technology, you might do that with the atomic bomb, right?

Well, then you need fuel to land on the moon and to leave the moon, which they didn't have. This is why NASA destroyed all the technology. It's one of the clips at Sobrell.com, a NASA engineer saying, we intentionally destroyed all of the moon landing technology. Now, if they were ever going to destroy a technology, you might do that with the atomic bomb, right?

We used it to end the war, but let's not do that again. And yet just 10 years later, atomic bombs are 1,000 times more powerful. You see? So if they really went to the moon, the last thing they would do would be to destroy all the technology. They destroyed the technology. They destroyed the telemetry data where the rocket really was.

We used it to end the war, but let's not do that again. And yet just 10 years later, atomic bombs are 1,000 times more powerful. You see? So if they really went to the moon, the last thing they would do would be to destroy all the technology. They destroyed the technology. They destroyed the telemetry data where the rocket really was.

We used it to end the war, but let's not do that again. And yet just 10 years later, atomic bombs are 1,000 times more powerful. You see? So if they really went to the moon, the last thing they would do would be to destroy all the technology. They destroyed the technology. They destroyed the telemetry data where the rocket really was.

They destroyed all of the original videotapes, which you would never do if you really went, but that's exactly what you would do if you were faking it. So that's actually incidental proof that they faked it as well.

They destroyed all of the original videotapes, which you would never do if you really went, but that's exactly what you would do if you were faking it. So that's actually incidental proof that they faked it as well.

They destroyed all of the original videotapes, which you would never do if you really went, but that's exactly what you would do if you were faking it. So that's actually incidental proof that they faked it as well.

That's a clip. If you want to go to Sabrell.com, Moon Man video links, look for the one. NASA admits they destroyed the technology. His name is Don Pettit.

That's a clip. If you want to go to Sabrell.com, Moon Man video links, look for the one. NASA admits they destroyed the technology. His name is Don Pettit.

That's a clip. If you want to go to Sabrell.com, Moon Man video links, look for the one. NASA admits they destroyed the technology. His name is Don Pettit.

$250 billion. Yeah, so you can imagine, would Bill Gates spend $250 billion making the first AI? Hey, that worked great. And then throw the schematics, the blueprints, and the hardware in the furnace. He would never do that.

$250 billion. Yeah, so you can imagine, would Bill Gates spend $250 billion making the first AI? Hey, that worked great. And then throw the schematics, the blueprints, and the hardware in the furnace. He would never do that.

$250 billion. Yeah, so you can imagine, would Bill Gates spend $250 billion making the first AI? Hey, that worked great. And then throw the schematics, the blueprints, and the hardware in the furnace. He would never do that.

But that's what they did with the moon technology, because you could prove, like we're proving now, it didn't have enough fuel to leave Earth orbit, doesn't have the radiation protection. It can't have the lunar module combat 250 degrees outside with air conditioning on a bunch of car batteries. It didn't even have enough fuel to... to leave the lunar surface.

But that's what they did with the moon technology, because you could prove, like we're proving now, it didn't have enough fuel to leave Earth orbit, doesn't have the radiation protection. It can't have the lunar module combat 250 degrees outside with air conditioning on a bunch of car batteries. It didn't even have enough fuel to... to leave the lunar surface.

But that's what they did with the moon technology, because you could prove, like we're proving now, it didn't have enough fuel to leave Earth orbit, doesn't have the radiation protection. It can't have the lunar module combat 250 degrees outside with air conditioning on a bunch of car batteries. It didn't even have enough fuel to... to leave the lunar surface.

It was only two aluminum foil thickness in the spacecraft. Would you even get into a spacecraft that was the thickness of two pieces of aluminum foil where your elbow or your knee or your finger could accidentally go? I thought it was an eighth of an inch. No, that's the shielding on the spacecraft, but they're talking about the lunar module itself. You're talking about the command module.