Ben Cohen

And Hamas is nowhere near there.

Now, the only military force that would be capable of disarming Hamas would be the Israel Defense Forces, and it would achieve that through the final defeat of Hamas, which is something that was prevented by the ceasefire.

I certainly don't think US troops are going to do it, and I would never recommend that they did.

And I don't think any other country is going to be willing to step up.

The comparison here, I think, actually, it's a little bit like, I mean, you mentioned Ukraine, and that's a pertinent parallel.

But I think there's another parallel to be drawn with Lebanon.

If you remember, there was a war back in 2006 between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

And at the end of that war, the UN Security Council passed a resolution where they said the only legitimate armed forces in Lebanon should be the armed forces of the Lebanese state.

So that was a call for the disarmament of Hezbollah.

That disarmament never happened because yet again, the assumption was, well, Hezbollah might at one point, you know, they'll agree they're reasonable people.

They'll agree to give up their arms.

That didn't happen.

Nonetheless, the UN still deployed a peacekeeping force, UNIFIL.

I think it's about 15,000 peacekeepers in South Lebanon.

So you really had a headache here for the Israelis, because not only were they still facing at that time something like 150,000 Hezbollah missiles aimed at the north of Israel, but they also had to navigate and negotiate their way through this UN force.

which was effectively behaving as a buffer for Hezbollah.

I think the problem that the Israelis see in Gaza is a repeat of that.

Lebanon, but this time in Gaza.

Instead of Irish and French troops in Lebanon, we're going to have Pakistani, Azeri, Jordanian, and Eritrean troops, and we're going to try and go after these Hamas terrorists, and there's a danger that in doing so, we're going to kill

one of these peacekeepers, that the peacekeepers will be collateral damage.