Ben van Kerkwyk

Well, it does.

And I think what's made this...

well let's call it alternative perspective much more possible even plausible is is all of the the adjacent fields of science and work that is that is basically providing a plausible context

for these ideas that there was an ancient lost civilization that is responsible for the roots of some of the things we see in these civilizations, responsible for some of the technological enigmas that we find on these sites.

And this is all stuff that's happened in recent years in adjacent fields of science, things like the extension of the human timeline,

the evidence for severe erosion on these sites, our understanding of climate history and cataclysm.

I mean there seems to be some evidence that they might have because – What about the Sumerian kings list?

Well, this is a big part of it.

Yeah, I mean not just them but almost every civilization that talks about – even the Bible.

It talks about pre-Diluvian or pre-flood civilizations, often talks about people living for hundreds of years, if not longer than that, thousands of years.

You have an Egyptian's kings list that does the same thing.

But even in the Bible, Noah was – 600.

600, right?

So you have –

Yeah, I think something like that.

You have many examples of these, what they would describe as pre-cataclysm or pre-flood civilizations where people live for a long time.

But you just, I mean, not just, there's an extension of individual human timeline, but we also know that there's an extension of the human, like how long humans have been here.

Right.

Right?

Because that's going back further and further all the time.