Ben Zhao

Well, yeah, very different type of nonprofit, I would argue. I'm more interested in being just the first person to walk down a particular path and encouraging others to follow. So I would love it if we were not the only technology in the space. Every time I see one of these other research papers that works to protect human creatives, I applaud all that.

Well, yeah, very different type of nonprofit, I would argue. I'm more interested in being just the first person to walk down a particular path and encouraging others to follow. So I would love it if we were not the only technology in the space. Every time I see one of these other research papers that works to protect human creatives, I applaud all that.

In order for AI and human creativity to coexist in the future, they had to have a complementary relationship. And what that really means is that AI needs human work product or images or text in order to survive. So they need humans and humans really need to be compensated for this work that they're producing.

In order for AI and human creativity to coexist in the future, they had to have a complementary relationship. And what that really means is that AI needs human work product or images or text in order to survive. So they need humans and humans really need to be compensated for this work that they're producing.

In order for AI and human creativity to coexist in the future, they had to have a complementary relationship. And what that really means is that AI needs human work product or images or text in order to survive. So they need humans and humans really need to be compensated for this work that they're producing.

Otherwise, if human artistry dies out, then AI will die out because they're going to have nothing new to learn on and they're just going to get stale and fall apart.

Otherwise, if human artistry dies out, then AI will die out because they're going to have nothing new to learn on and they're just going to get stale and fall apart.

Otherwise, if human artistry dies out, then AI will die out because they're going to have nothing new to learn on and they're just going to get stale and fall apart.

Over the last couple of years, I've been practicing lots of fun analogies. Barbed wire is one, the large Doberman in your backyard. One particular funny one is where the hot sauce that you put on your lunch. So if that unscrupulous coworker steals your lunch repeatedly, they get a tummy ache. But wait a minute, you have to eat your lunch too. That doesn't sound very good.

Over the last couple of years, I've been practicing lots of fun analogies. Barbed wire is one, the large Doberman in your backyard. One particular funny one is where the hot sauce that you put on your lunch. So if that unscrupulous coworker steals your lunch repeatedly, they get a tummy ache. But wait a minute, you have to eat your lunch too. That doesn't sound very good.

Over the last couple of years, I've been practicing lots of fun analogies. Barbed wire is one, the large Doberman in your backyard. One particular funny one is where the hot sauce that you put on your lunch. So if that unscrupulous coworker steals your lunch repeatedly, they get a tummy ache. But wait a minute, you have to eat your lunch too. That doesn't sound very good.

Well, you know, you eat the portion that you know is good and then you leave out some stuff that... Got it.

Well, you know, you eat the portion that you know is good and then you leave out some stuff that... Got it.

Well, you know, you eat the portion that you know is good and then you leave out some stuff that... Got it.

Boy, that's a bit of a loaded question because honestly, we don't know. It really comes down to how these models are being used. Ultimately, I think what people want is creative content that's crafted by humans.

Boy, that's a bit of a loaded question because honestly, we don't know. It really comes down to how these models are being used. Ultimately, I think what people want is creative content that's crafted by humans.

Boy, that's a bit of a loaded question because honestly, we don't know. It really comes down to how these models are being used. Ultimately, I think what people want is creative content that's crafted by humans.

In that sense, the fair system would be generative AI systems that stayed out of the creative domain, that continue to let human creatives do what they do best, to create really truly imaginative ideas and visuals, and then use generative AI for domains where it is more reasonable. For example, conversational chatbots seem like a reasonable use for them as long as they don't hallucinate.

In that sense, the fair system would be generative AI systems that stayed out of the creative domain, that continue to let human creatives do what they do best, to create really truly imaginative ideas and visuals, and then use generative AI for domains where it is more reasonable. For example, conversational chatbots seem like a reasonable use for them as long as they don't hallucinate.

In that sense, the fair system would be generative AI systems that stayed out of the creative domain, that continue to let human creatives do what they do best, to create really truly imaginative ideas and visuals, and then use generative AI for domains where it is more reasonable. For example, conversational chatbots seem like a reasonable use for them as long as they don't hallucinate.