Benji Naesen

Well, we don't know for sure, because SDWorks releases a statement saying that the bike was weighed twice, and says it was 20 grams under weight limit.

And they also said the other weighing was 50 grams off.

Off the other weighing.

So my immediate thoughts are, first of all, what is the margin of error of the device that the UCI uses in this sense?

If it's more than 50 grams, more than 100 grams, whatever,

How accurate can a rule application here be based on a device that's not as accurate as the amount that it could be under hypothetically?

My second thought was 50 grams different compared to the 20 grams under.

Does that mean the 50 grams different was above the weight limit?

Or was it 50 grams lower?

My first assumption was also, there's no way SDWorks would have specifically said it like this if the second weighing was higher than 6.8.

Because then they would have said, the other weighing was above.

The statement?

The statement also declared that she had this setup in other races so far this season.

I think Kent Waverham might have been brought up by the media afterwards.

I don't know if the actual SDWorks statement said that.

And they also said they tested the bike themselves in their environment at 6.83 kilos after the race.

That doesn't sound great.

Exactly.

Now, I think my overall take comes down to

Just before I give my overall take, actually, I think later it came out that the second weighing was 70 grams under.