Beth Lyons

I don't think so because I think we recognize Michael Caine's voice and that there is a certain trust that comes from that that isn't associated with the synthetic voices.

Now,

People had that experience with the Notebook LM voices.

They were like when Notebook LM hit, it was like, oh, wow, this is how my friends would talk if I were overhearing friends.

So that has some trust associated with it.

I do believe that this is similar to why you would buy Time Magazine or Newsweek or invest in-

I'm not so much a nostalgia play, although also that, right?

Michael Caine would be more recognizable to baby boomers than it would to new generations.

But also, when you buy somebody's brand or their voice, you're getting all of the connotations that are associated with it, right?

You buy Time magazine.

Because Time magazine is understood to be a news source for a generation of people or multiple generations of people.

And so you get that, even though now that you've bought it, you get to decide whether it has that same news standard.

OK.

And you're going to talk about the chip, but I want to say one of the reasons that this is an important conversation to have is that the same thing that happened when LLMs could generate papers, research papers, all that stuff that happened to those gateways is potentially going to happen when quantum computing happens for encryption.

Like encryption is currently, well, it's encrypted, which means it's actually very hard to get, to break that.

Quantum, it's not hard at all.

We don't have a backup other than distributed chain, which is sort of a backup, but maybe not a backup.

We don't have anything waiting in the wings to come out, as far as I know.

Right.

And if I remember correctly, what we're talking about is increasing quantum stability, right?