Beth Lyons

But...

And and the the crux of this is that the contract that Anthropic signed and the War Department signed together did actually, I believe, lay out these as as not as as things that were not going to be able to happen.

Why?

Outside the context of this.

Other Frontier Labs, OpenAI, Grok.

I actually don't know if Gemini's in that.

It may be meta.

There is a third.

Sorry, I don't remember which one.

And they have made plays like, hey, we're willing to do it.

And the two sticklers are surveillance of U.S.

citizens inside the U.S.

and weaponry that does not include a human as part of the end decision making.

So is that true?

But it's like constitutional law and national security policy.

And the question about...

if wartime legal mechanisms can strip AI safeguards just because of wartime, and who actually draws the line on autonomous weapons and mass surveillance, and is there a line left to draw?

But, of course, the piece in that that has been argued for decades

60 years something like that is uh war is something that gets declared by congress it's a it's a specific thing um and we are technically not at war right so like this sort of this bubbles all all the all the gremlins up really yeah

might be misconstrued as you know abdicating or a lie Anthropic is really good at a bunch of things but this kind of messaging I feel like there isn't anyone who's really taken it on as their baby