Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
109 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

And I think that's destigmatizing being open, realizing that you're not alone.

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

So there are side effects while taking benzodiazepines.

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

There are side effects while taking antidepressants, and some of them are similar.

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

And same with withdrawal.

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

It can be a very similar picture.

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

The biggest thing I've learned is that there are too few guardrails around these medications, which do help a lot of people.

The Journal.
Is America on Too Many Psychiatric Drugs?

And it's been sort of this under-recognized, un-talked-about problem for many years.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Yeah, John is absolutely right. We are at the tail end of a very bruising pandemic, very bruising to public health in the sense that there was a lot of anger and backlash, and that remains, and the view that government was not efficient. More broadly speaking, the administration says chronic diseases are worsening and changes need to be made. So there's two things here.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Yeah, John is absolutely right. We are at the tail end of a very bruising pandemic, very bruising to public health in the sense that there was a lot of anger and backlash, and that remains, and the view that government was not efficient. More broadly speaking, the administration says chronic diseases are worsening and changes need to be made. So there's two things here.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

There are the philosophical changes. They view a smaller, more effective government and more focused on chronic diseases. then there is the immediate impact of the changes being made suddenly and the disruption that that causes.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

There are the philosophical changes. They view a smaller, more effective government and more focused on chronic diseases. then there is the immediate impact of the changes being made suddenly and the disruption that that causes.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Yeah, absolutely. Because when you disrupt a public health program or any health program, you are going to have consequences, if not immediately, certainly down the line. You know, an important part of fighting HIV is not treating people already infected with HIV, but preventing people from getting it, giving them access to pre-exposure prophylaxis, education, many other programs.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Yeah, absolutely. Because when you disrupt a public health program or any health program, you are going to have consequences, if not immediately, certainly down the line. You know, an important part of fighting HIV is not treating people already infected with HIV, but preventing people from getting it, giving them access to pre-exposure prophylaxis, education, many other programs.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

And most of them seem to be targeted for cuts.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

And most of them seem to be targeted for cuts.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Yeah, it's another rethink. The State Department and the administration have said there's a lot of waste in our funding. We're funding a lot of things around the world. We need to rethink this and we need to reevaluate exactly what we want to fund. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Yeah, it's another rethink. The State Department and the administration have said there's a lot of waste in our funding. We're funding a lot of things around the world. We need to rethink this and we need to reevaluate exactly what we want to fund. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Some of the health programs that USAID funded will be continued, but they must qualify as serving American interests, which is a pretty broad definition.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Some of the health programs that USAID funded will be continued, but they must qualify as serving American interests, which is a pretty broad definition.

WSJ What’s News
Inside the Biggest U.S. Public Health Shakeup in Modern History

Well, it's difficult to understand what that model would be right now. Certainly every country that has lost money, I mean, some African countries are heavily, heavily dependent on donors abroad. They have two things they're looking at. One, how much money can they themselves put up?