Brady Holmer

Like, I'm not even gonna try to do it.

So I think from a public health messaging perspective, it's important to sort of have these blanket ranges of physical activity.

But I don't know, imagine a scenario where you have,

You know, how much exercise do I need to do?

Well, for what?

Are you concerned about cardiovascular disease?

Then you probably should do this much.

If you're just concerned about cancer or diabetes, maybe you need to do this much.

So we can almost get more granular with the guidelines in a way.

But I think I understand the idea that public health messaging at some point needs to be you can't turn people off from the idea that, well, this is just too complex.

I'm not going to exercise at all.

So it would be interesting to have a scenario where you have different guidelines for different outcomes.

You know, do you want to age better?

Do you want to are you trying to be like a super high performer or are you just trying to like, you know, control your blood glucose better?

You obviously need a different level of activity for those different.

Right.

I agree.

And it's like, we don't even need, because we have so much data, I don't even think we need to use that assumption anymore.

We can really say, like, what is the range where you get this maximal risk reduction?

We have that.