Bret Weinstein

Well, one, I think as long as you use the rule that those who are not saying, those who are not agreeing with me must be on the other side, it's very easy to end up everybody's enemy. And yeah, it's crazy.

Well, one, I think as long as you use the rule that those who are not saying, those who are not agreeing with me must be on the other side, it's very easy to end up everybody's enemy. And yeah, it's crazy.

I am, I think, trying, maybe I'm wrong about the reality of the situation, but I'm certainly trying to give decent insight into how Israel can be safer, how the world can be safer, how Islam can be safer. I think it's better for everybody. That's my intent. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But that's the real issue, though. The

I am, I think, trying, maybe I'm wrong about the reality of the situation, but I'm certainly trying to give decent insight into how Israel can be safer, how the world can be safer, how Islam can be safer. I think it's better for everybody. That's my intent. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But that's the real issue, though. The

I am, I think, trying, maybe I'm wrong about the reality of the situation, but I'm certainly trying to give decent insight into how Israel can be safer, how the world can be safer, how Islam can be safer. I think it's better for everybody. That's my intent. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But that's the real issue, though. The

The inability to have discussions because some conclusion is understood to follow from them potentially, and we can't risk that conclusion, therefore the discussion is not allowed, that is utterly toxic to us. The West. There's a reason that the First Amendment is enshrined as our first enumerated right.

The inability to have discussions because some conclusion is understood to follow from them potentially, and we can't risk that conclusion, therefore the discussion is not allowed, that is utterly toxic to us. The West. There's a reason that the First Amendment is enshrined as our first enumerated right.

The inability to have discussions because some conclusion is understood to follow from them potentially, and we can't risk that conclusion, therefore the discussion is not allowed, that is utterly toxic to us. The West. There's a reason that the First Amendment is enshrined as our first enumerated right.

And I'm a little concerned that the Constitution itself is not up to the challenges of modernity. It doesn't anticipate AI. It doesn't anticipate social media. It doesn't anticipate the ability to study psychology with scientific tools and, you know, manipulate with industrial strength propaganda. But the principle is still exactly right.

And I'm a little concerned that the Constitution itself is not up to the challenges of modernity. It doesn't anticipate AI. It doesn't anticipate social media. It doesn't anticipate the ability to study psychology with scientific tools and, you know, manipulate with industrial strength propaganda. But the principle is still exactly right.

And I'm a little concerned that the Constitution itself is not up to the challenges of modernity. It doesn't anticipate AI. It doesn't anticipate social media. It doesn't anticipate the ability to study psychology with scientific tools and, you know, manipulate with industrial strength propaganda. But the principle is still exactly right.

And I will say, I heard your discussion with Matt Walsh last week, maybe. And I was fascinated by it because Matt Walsh and I are very different creatures. Like, I really am a liberal and he really is a conservative person. And I heard him say all kinds of things that were provocative. And I found it absolutely refreshing.

And I will say, I heard your discussion with Matt Walsh last week, maybe. And I was fascinated by it because Matt Walsh and I are very different creatures. Like, I really am a liberal and he really is a conservative person. And I heard him say all kinds of things that were provocative. And I found it absolutely refreshing.

And I will say, I heard your discussion with Matt Walsh last week, maybe. And I was fascinated by it because Matt Walsh and I are very different creatures. Like, I really am a liberal and he really is a conservative person. And I heard him say all kinds of things that were provocative. And I found it absolutely refreshing.

Just the idea, you know, that you could navigate those questions in public was a breath of fresh air. And I'm hoping...

Just the idea, you know, that you could navigate those questions in public was a breath of fresh air. And I'm hoping...

Just the idea, you know, that you could navigate those questions in public was a breath of fresh air. And I'm hoping...

I'm hoping that all parties who are acting in good faith and really trying to figure out how to get the nation and the world pointed in the right direction will recognize that we've lost the one tool that has been useful in this regard, which is the ability to hash things out, to not demonize people for holding perspectives.

I'm hoping that all parties who are acting in good faith and really trying to figure out how to get the nation and the world pointed in the right direction will recognize that we've lost the one tool that has been useful in this regard, which is the ability to hash things out, to not demonize people for holding perspectives.

I'm hoping that all parties who are acting in good faith and really trying to figure out how to get the nation and the world pointed in the right direction will recognize that we've lost the one tool that has been useful in this regard, which is the ability to hash things out, to not demonize people for holding perspectives.