Bret Weinstein

gravely injure people for the rest of their lives. So anybody who had discovered that they had been party to that would naturally want to just staunch the bleeding. And that's not what happened. And it's still not happening. And what's more, there is a shell game being played over the cause of the vaccine harms to the extent that they are acknowledged at all.

There is what I think is an organized campaign to portray it as the result of the unfortunate choice of the spike protein, when in fact much of the damage has nothing to do with the content of the shot at all. It's the platform itself. And, you know, we're watching pharma reformulate shot after shot on the MRNA platform. They're pioneering. So it's the novel technology itself.

There is what I think is an organized campaign to portray it as the result of the unfortunate choice of the spike protein, when in fact much of the damage has nothing to do with the content of the shot at all. It's the platform itself. And, you know, we're watching pharma reformulate shot after shot on the MRNA platform. They're pioneering. So it's the novel technology itself.

There is what I think is an organized campaign to portray it as the result of the unfortunate choice of the spike protein, when in fact much of the damage has nothing to do with the content of the shot at all. It's the platform itself. And, you know, we're watching pharma reformulate shot after shot on the MRNA platform. They're pioneering. So it's the novel technology itself.

It's the novel technology itself, which Again, you're intervening in not only a complex system in this case, but a nested series of complex systems. You've got an epidemic, the spreading of a disease. You've got the human body. Within that, you've got the immune system. These are each complex systems in their own right.

It's the novel technology itself, which Again, you're intervening in not only a complex system in this case, but a nested series of complex systems. You've got an epidemic, the spreading of a disease. You've got the human body. Within that, you've got the immune system. These are each complex systems in their own right.

It's the novel technology itself, which Again, you're intervening in not only a complex system in this case, but a nested series of complex systems. You've got an epidemic, the spreading of a disease. You've got the human body. Within that, you've got the immune system. These are each complex systems in their own right.

And the ability to introduce a novel technology and to predict the outcome, as I think I may have discussed with you before, One of the things that we've discovered, I have to assume pharma didn't know this, but one of the things we've discovered is that if you've had two of the mRNA shots, that your body starts producing a special class of antibody that turns the immune system down.

And the ability to introduce a novel technology and to predict the outcome, as I think I may have discussed with you before, One of the things that we've discovered, I have to assume pharma didn't know this, but one of the things we've discovered is that if you've had two of the mRNA shots, that your body starts producing a special class of antibody that turns the immune system down.

And the ability to introduce a novel technology and to predict the outcome, as I think I may have discussed with you before, One of the things that we've discovered, I have to assume pharma didn't know this, but one of the things we've discovered is that if you've had two of the mRNA shots, that your body starts producing a special class of antibody that turns the immune system down.

That's a very dangerous thing to have triggered. It ought to have caused somebody to, you know,

That's a very dangerous thing to have triggered. It ought to have caused somebody to, you know,

That's a very dangerous thing to have triggered. It ought to have caused somebody to, you know,

Yes. And, you know, this is the lesson of modern technology is that you should engage it with tremendous trepidation until, right. And, you know, liberals have a lot to answer for at the moment, but there was a time when liberals were focused on the precautionary principle, which is exactly this, right?

Yes. And, you know, this is the lesson of modern technology is that you should engage it with tremendous trepidation until, right. And, you know, liberals have a lot to answer for at the moment, but there was a time when liberals were focused on the precautionary principle, which is exactly this, right?

Yes. And, you know, this is the lesson of modern technology is that you should engage it with tremendous trepidation until, right. And, you know, liberals have a lot to answer for at the moment, but there was a time when liberals were focused on the precautionary principle, which is exactly this, right?

If you're going to engage something new, you should assume it's harmful until proven safe rather than assume it's safe until proven harmful. And we have abandoned this principle, right?

If you're going to engage something new, you should assume it's harmful until proven safe rather than assume it's safe until proven harmful. And we have abandoned this principle, right?

If you're going to engage something new, you should assume it's harmful until proven safe rather than assume it's safe until proven harmful. And we have abandoned this principle, right?

You know, I, Heather and I have an ongoing discussion where she'll say, I don't see how people could possibly believe X. And then she will give some example where people have said something that couldn't possibly be right. And I will say to her,