Bret Weinstein

I am concerned that the right way to address Tucker's challenge, and as I said the last time I was on your show, when I heard him say it the first time, I reached out to him and I said, you know, you really ought to let me talk to you about what's actually going on here, and he welcomed it.

We still haven't sat down to do it, but nonetheless, he's open to hearing that he doesn't have it right, to his credit. But here's the problem. The correct response to Tucker, I do not believe, involves what most people want me to do in response to something like what Tucker said.

We still haven't sat down to do it, but nonetheless, he's open to hearing that he doesn't have it right, to his credit. But here's the problem. The correct response to Tucker, I do not believe, involves what most people want me to do in response to something like what Tucker said.

We still haven't sat down to do it, but nonetheless, he's open to hearing that he doesn't have it right, to his credit. But here's the problem. The correct response to Tucker, I do not believe, involves what most people want me to do in response to something like what Tucker said.

I think people want the. career evolutionary biologist to break out a bunch of examples from nature that make the case very, very clear so that they can relax. Tucker's concern isn't based in science, and they can go back to feeling comfortable that the Darwinists have it well in hand. That's not where I am. I could do that, but I don't feel honorable doing that.

I think people want the. career evolutionary biologist to break out a bunch of examples from nature that make the case very, very clear so that they can relax. Tucker's concern isn't based in science, and they can go back to feeling comfortable that the Darwinists have it well in hand. That's not where I am. I could do that, but I don't feel honorable doing that.

I think people want the. career evolutionary biologist to break out a bunch of examples from nature that make the case very, very clear so that they can relax. Tucker's concern isn't based in science, and they can go back to feeling comfortable that the Darwinists have it well in hand. That's not where I am. I could do that, but I don't feel honorable doing that.

I think as a scientist, I should not be in the business of persuading people. I want you to be persuaded. I want you to be persuaded by the facts. I want them to persuade you, but I don't think I'm allowed to persuade you. I think that it's effectively PR when I attempt to bring people over to Team Darwin.

I think as a scientist, I should not be in the business of persuading people. I want you to be persuaded. I want you to be persuaded by the facts. I want them to persuade you, but I don't think I'm allowed to persuade you. I think that it's effectively PR when I attempt to bring people over to Team Darwin.

I think as a scientist, I should not be in the business of persuading people. I want you to be persuaded. I want you to be persuaded by the facts. I want them to persuade you, but I don't think I'm allowed to persuade you. I think that it's effectively PR when I attempt to bring people over to Team Darwin.

Further, as I'm sure I've mentioned to you before, I'm not happy with the state of Darwinism in as it has been managed by modern Darwinists. In fact, I'm kind of annoyed by it. And although Tucker, I do not believe, is right in the end, there is a reason that the perspective that he was giving voice to is catching on in 2025.

Further, as I'm sure I've mentioned to you before, I'm not happy with the state of Darwinism in as it has been managed by modern Darwinists. In fact, I'm kind of annoyed by it. And although Tucker, I do not believe, is right in the end, there is a reason that the perspective that he was giving voice to is catching on in 2025.

Further, as I'm sure I've mentioned to you before, I'm not happy with the state of Darwinism in as it has been managed by modern Darwinists. In fact, I'm kind of annoyed by it. And although Tucker, I do not believe, is right in the end, there is a reason that the perspective that he was giving voice to is catching on in 2025.

And it has to do with the fact that, in my opinion, the mainstream Darwinists are telling a kind of lie about how much we know and what remains to be understood. So by reporting that, yes... Darwinism is true and we know how it works and people who aren't compelled by the story are illiterate or ignorant or whatever. They are pretending to know more than they do. So.

And it has to do with the fact that, in my opinion, the mainstream Darwinists are telling a kind of lie about how much we know and what remains to be understood. So by reporting that, yes... Darwinism is true and we know how it works and people who aren't compelled by the story are illiterate or ignorant or whatever. They are pretending to know more than they do. So.

And it has to do with the fact that, in my opinion, the mainstream Darwinists are telling a kind of lie about how much we know and what remains to be understood. So by reporting that, yes... Darwinism is true and we know how it works and people who aren't compelled by the story are illiterate or ignorant or whatever. They are pretending to know more than they do. So.

All that being said, let me say I think modern Darwinism is broken. Yes, I do think I know more or less how to fix it. I'm annoyed at my colleagues for I think lying to themselves about the state of modern Darwinism. I think I know why that happened. I think they were concerned that a creationist worldview was always a threat that it would reassert itself.

All that being said, let me say I think modern Darwinism is broken. Yes, I do think I know more or less how to fix it. I'm annoyed at my colleagues for I think lying to themselves about the state of modern Darwinism. I think I know why that happened. I think they were concerned that a creationist worldview was always a threat that it would reassert itself.

All that being said, let me say I think modern Darwinism is broken. Yes, I do think I know more or less how to fix it. I'm annoyed at my colleagues for I think lying to themselves about the state of modern Darwinism. I think I know why that happened. I think they were concerned that a creationist worldview was always a threat that it would reassert itself.

And so they pretended that Darwinism was a more complete explanation as it was presented than it ever was.