Bret Weinstein

Well, in this case, you've got everybody in a de facto training program to be an influencer and almost none of them are going to get there.

Well, in this case, you've got everybody in a de facto training program to be an influencer and almost none of them are going to get there.

Well, in this case, you've got everybody in a de facto training program to be an influencer and almost none of them are going to get there.

And get their UBI and yeah. Yeah.

And get their UBI and yeah. Yeah.

And get their UBI and yeah. Yeah.

He said, well, he said a couple things. It was a little confusing. He said that, you know, we see evidence of adaptation, but we don't see evidence of evolution and that we've really gotten beyond the Darwinian model. We've essentially come to understand that it's not right.

He said, well, he said a couple things. It was a little confusing. He said that, you know, we see evidence of adaptation, but we don't see evidence of evolution and that we've really gotten beyond the Darwinian model. We've essentially come to understand that it's not right.

He said, well, he said a couple things. It was a little confusing. He said that, you know, we see evidence of adaptation, but we don't see evidence of evolution and that we've really gotten beyond the Darwinian model. We've essentially come to understand that it's not right.

It's an argument for intelligent design, I think. First of all, I want to clean up a little bit of what he said just so it's interpretable. I don't really think he means we see the evidence for adaptation but not evolution. That's not coherent. I think what he means is we see evidence for what we would call microevolution, but we don't see evidence for what we would call macroevolution.

It's an argument for intelligent design, I think. First of all, I want to clean up a little bit of what he said just so it's interpretable. I don't really think he means we see the evidence for adaptation but not evolution. That's not coherent. I think what he means is we see evidence for what we would call microevolution, but we don't see evidence for what we would call macroevolution.

It's an argument for intelligent design, I think. First of all, I want to clean up a little bit of what he said just so it's interpretable. I don't really think he means we see the evidence for adaptation but not evolution. That's not coherent. I think what he means is we see evidence for what we would call microevolution, but we don't see evidence for what we would call macroevolution.

This is a... commonly believed thing in intelligent design circles. And so microevolution, we would talk about the way a creature or a population of creatures would change relative to their environment. If the environment gets drier, those individuals who are more drought tolerant will outcompete the individuals that require more water. And so we'll see the population change over time.

This is a... commonly believed thing in intelligent design circles. And so microevolution, we would talk about the way a creature or a population of creatures would change relative to their environment. If the environment gets drier, those individuals who are more drought tolerant will outcompete the individuals that require more water. And so we'll see the population change over time.

This is a... commonly believed thing in intelligent design circles. And so microevolution, we would talk about the way a creature or a population of creatures would change relative to their environment. If the environment gets drier, those individuals who are more drought tolerant will outcompete the individuals that require more water. And so we'll see the population change over time.

But, he's saying, we don't see evidence for macroevolution, which is the production of new species from old species. A monkey becoming a person. Yeah. We don't see big changes like that. Now- I don't want to bore your audience.

But, he's saying, we don't see evidence for macroevolution, which is the production of new species from old species. A monkey becoming a person. Yeah. We don't see big changes like that. Now- I don't want to bore your audience.

But, he's saying, we don't see evidence for macroevolution, which is the production of new species from old species. A monkey becoming a person. Yeah. We don't see big changes like that. Now- I don't want to bore your audience.

I am concerned that the right way to address Tucker's challenge, and as I said the last time I was on your show, when I heard him say it the first time, I reached out to him and I said, you know, you really ought to let me talk to you about what's actually going on here, and he welcomed it.

I am concerned that the right way to address Tucker's challenge, and as I said the last time I was on your show, when I heard him say it the first time, I reached out to him and I said, you know, you really ought to let me talk to you about what's actually going on here, and he welcomed it.