Bret Weinstein

Yes, and I believe they are stuck in a difficult position because of the political realities of the jobs they now hold. But yes, I believe these results are sufficiently straightforward and their implications sufficiently stark that we would be in agreement.

Yes, and I believe they are stuck in a difficult position because of the political realities of the jobs they now hold. But yes, I believe these results are sufficiently straightforward and their implications sufficiently stark that we would be in agreement.

I would agree, and I would go even further. I feel a lot of compassion for President Trump. He did do something remarkable in his response to the emergency that we at least believed we had at that point. It wasn't his failure. He's not a biologist. He's not a doctor. He's not a vaccinologist. He can hardly be expected to understand the hazards that were lurking inside of this platform.

I would agree, and I would go even further. I feel a lot of compassion for President Trump. He did do something remarkable in his response to the emergency that we at least believed we had at that point. It wasn't his failure. He's not a biologist. He's not a doctor. He's not a vaccinologist. He can hardly be expected to understand the hazards that were lurking inside of this platform.

But it wasn't just the companies that lied to him. It was actually his deputies, federal employees, including the most highly paid federal employee of all. Dr. Fauci lied to him about the situation that we were in and about the safety and efficacy of these mRNA shots.

But it wasn't just the companies that lied to him. It was actually his deputies, federal employees, including the most highly paid federal employee of all. Dr. Fauci lied to him about the situation that we were in and about the safety and efficacy of these mRNA shots.

If I were him, I would be proud of the accomplishment of getting them to market so quickly and I would be livid with the people who conned him.

If I were him, I would be proud of the accomplishment of getting them to market so quickly and I would be livid with the people who conned him.

I would also be very interested in getting to the bottom of how that happened.

I would also be very interested in getting to the bottom of how that happened.

I'm a huge fan of the idea of steel manning your opponent's argument, but I have a requirement. I think steel manning is only appropriate when your opponent is making an argument in good faith. And it is absolutely clear to me that Peter Hotez and Paul Offit are making arguments in bad faith.

I'm a huge fan of the idea of steel manning your opponent's argument, but I have a requirement. I think steel manning is only appropriate when your opponent is making an argument in good faith. And it is absolutely clear to me that Peter Hotez and Paul Offit are making arguments in bad faith.

I don't think it is possible to make a credible good faith argument for injecting an mRNA COVID shot into a healthy child. I don't think it's possible. If I could come up with something, I would do it just for the exercise.

I don't think it is possible to make a credible good faith argument for injecting an mRNA COVID shot into a healthy child. I don't think it's possible. If I could come up with something, I would do it just for the exercise.

But I really think it is outside the scope of of the process of steel manning in order to understand, because deep down they know that these shots are going to kill and injure children who would otherwise tolerate covid just fine. And, you know, that's on them.

But I really think it is outside the scope of of the process of steel manning in order to understand, because deep down they know that these shots are going to kill and injure children who would otherwise tolerate covid just fine. And, you know, that's on them.

Well, people need to understand that there is a strange nuance in the law. Any shot that is on the childhood vaccine schedule carries full legal liability protection, even in the form injected into adults. So these companies have an incentive to put this on the childhood vaccine schedule, even if there is no medical or epidemiological justification for doing so.

Well, people need to understand that there is a strange nuance in the law. Any shot that is on the childhood vaccine schedule carries full legal liability protection, even in the form injected into adults. So these companies have an incentive to put this on the childhood vaccine schedule, even if there is no medical or epidemiological justification for doing so.

By doing so, their adult vaccines escape lawsuits. Now, in the case of the COVID vaccines, I believe there is a double immunity that they are protecting. But it is hard to nail down the details because they've played a shell game with us. What they did was they sought EUA, that is emergency use authorization, for the initial shots in the early parts of COVID.

By doing so, their adult vaccines escape lawsuits. Now, in the case of the COVID vaccines, I believe there is a double immunity that they are protecting. But it is hard to nail down the details because they've played a shell game with us. What they did was they sought EUA, that is emergency use authorization, for the initial shots in the early parts of COVID.