Brian Cory Dobbs

So it just leaves it to the rest of us to try to fill in the gaps.

And even the rest of us, we still admit there are some gaps here, like you just asked about the timeline.

Yeah, I don't really know, man.

Like, I just, I try to rely on what's practical.

That's why I really appreciate what Jeffrey Jum brings to the analysis.

Recent guests you've had, I've watched, I love watching the show.

You know, he's trying to talk about nuts and bolts.

That's where I try to keep things.

Metaphysical isn't my specialty, but I'll be damned if it just doesn't align with what we're actually looking at, what we're actually discovering.

And, oh, by the way, if you get enough, back to the nuclear thing, two things.

They ran nuclear tests in the mid-20th century, and certain nuclear tests actually produce lightning, nuclear lightning.

We have this on film.

So was that the lightning that caused that scar?

I don't know, maybe.

But in terms of how much power we're talking about, Ryan, just a few last couple slides here, because I want to talk about the energy involved here.

Steve Bogalski of Georgia Tech, the nuclear weapons expert who I asked about all this, he was interviewed by a website.

And they asked him about this specifically.

They asked him about Oppenheimer.

And what he was explaining was that there wasn't enough energy to ignite the atoms in the atmosphere to start this runaway chain reaction ignition.

And they're like, well, but could there be?