Brian Fitzgibbons

So, you know, I think in the coming days, we're going to learn a lot more about the case.

What is he saying, Brian?

The animal comment was perplexing.

I believe what the sheriff is saying is that at 1.47, that doorbell camera was removed from its base so that there was some digital log in the camera to that effect.

And now at 2.12, you have to understand a Nest camera has three modes, home, away, and off.

And in the home mode...

it will still register seeing a person and that will log that data in a log that it saw a person, but it won't be recording while in home mode.

So, you know, was the camera in home mode?

It just made it log that event.

That's what it seems to be to me.

I don't think that these cameras are gonna mistake a person for an animal.

Most of the cameras nowadays will accurately record

You know, if they see a dog or a deer walk by it, it will record an animal over a person.

What it sounds like to me, Nancy, is that that camera was popped off from the inside of the house.

So it didn't register seeing anybody.

And then when it was moved at 2.12, it actually sees a person.

So I think what we can see, what we can glean from this timeline is the doorbell camera was disconnected off the base.

25 minutes later, that camera is moved and it's pointing in the direction that it actually registers contact with a person.

No, you're absolutely right.

That's exactly what we learned from that statement from the sheriff, that there are cameras inside the house.