Brian Maucere

: let's let's let's go through some of the other news, I know, one of the things I saw that I don't think you would have talked about yesterday was.

I saw that one of the initial judges in the or the initial judge in this ongoing anthropic had sued the government after them being labeled a threat.

At least there was some initial wording from the first judge that said this seems to be an attack on anthropic and not really specifically retaliation.

Yeah.

Did you talk about that yesterday or is that no, no, this is important.

Go for it.

And this just to put some more on this, this is from the AI report newsletters where I was first picking this up this morning as I was reading through and says key points.

U.S.

District Judge Rita Lynn says the government moves, quote, don't really seem to be tailored to the state, the stated national security concern, which is what you just said.

Then it talked about the dispute dispute.

And then the last part, it says the Justice Department attorney

conceded that the supply chain risk, that's a quote, designation does not stop contractors from using an anthropic on non-military work contradicting Defense Secretary Hegseth's public statements.

You know, court of law is a little different than somebody just rattling off or whatever.

And then, you know, the Justice Department having to say like, well, yeah, OK, technically there is nothing wrong with using anthropic for those things.

That's not that's not what the defense secretary said.

So obviously this is going to be an ongoing story.

We'll touch on it when there's more news on it.

But this is obviously the first step towards this particular lawsuit.

This is my personal opinion, but I hope that Anthropic wins on this one because I think this is a slippery, slippery slope.

And I would hate to see other companies beyond Anthropic who just don't catch the smiles the right way of the government all of a sudden be labeled.