Bridget McCormack

You know, that happens all the time.

You know, I reviewed 2,000 cases a year, 2,000 applications a year when I sat on the Michigan Supreme Court, and I can't tell you how many of them were—the intermediate appellate court didn't even rule on issue number three.

Like, they just ignored it, you know, and we—

We just want an answer.

So imagine if courts could do that.

Imagine if, you know, trial judges or appellate judges could pull the parties in and say, here's my understanding.

Did I get it right?

And then we could actually, like, be satisfied that they did.

That's probably not going to work in our, you know, bespoke, built for 18th century norm system.

But it can work for disputes in an AI dispute resolution system.

It's a website, although I assume we will have an app version of it.

We have an app version of all of our services.

You can log in on your phone, but you're logging into the case management system.

So really, it's two things.

We built an AI-native case management system for the AI arbitrator to operate on.

That effort is time well spent because it will replace our legacy case management system for all disputes within two years.

That's just going to be...

something everybody has an opportunity to benefit from, which saves time and money.

But the AI arbitrator is, like I said, a bunch of different agents, probably 20, sometimes more, depending on the complexity of the dispute, that operate across the arbitration process.

A bunch operate at the front end.