Bryan Callen

It's here and that's it.

Your privacy.

Well, it actually hinges on- It becomes a religion.

It actually hinges on murder, right?

So if somebody came across state lines and murdered somebody, you could do that.

That's absolutely legitimate.

When you define abortion as murder, okay, then there are strong legal grounds to establish that precedent.

Unless it's murder.

That's a federal crime.

Yeah.

So you certainly were a republic.

And so there are statutory laws, but they do not supersede in many cases federal law if it's something like murder.

That's a capital crime.

Now you're sounding like a leftist slash libertarian.

So when you have policy, the problem is we get into the weeds.

Technology creates problems that are major because typically, I think with Roe v. Wade, the abortion was legal until the fetus was viable on its own.

Okay, so once the fetus was, if it could be, the cutoff thing was without the mother, if it needs the mother, then it's still.

Right, a part of the mother.

Now, if the baby's eight months, no.

But what happens when technology can keep a six-week fetus alive and bring it to term?