Cal

That can be a missing monument marker.

That can be all, all sorts of things that just go, Oh, this puts me outside of this legal gray area.

And the thing that we've said from the get go, right.

Is like, we just need a nice, very quiet solution because the vast majority of these people don't want to be hassled.

They don't want to see a bunch of trucks piled up at a corner.

And I'm like, and neither do hunters.

Like, we just want to know that we're in the right and not be hassled and go do our thing.

And that is it.

So there's a ton of, ton of ground in the middle here.

Um,

And we're really, really trying to keep it that way versus see some of these arguments get picked up like, oh, it's anti-private property rights, whereas we're trying to define private property rights.

And like it happened in Wyoming, we were very supportive of a bill that clarified private property language and gave some assurances to the private side of the fence that,

People know what private property is.

Um, but what we're seeing out of the state so far is a lot of acknowledgement of the problems without any, uh, work towards fixing those problems.

Um, or like you said, you know, I, I had brought a solution, um, that would take a lot of work, but I think would, would pay really big dividends for everybody.

And there just wasn't a lot of interest in endorsing that effort or even acknowledging it as something productive.

But I think we'll get there, and that might be something that this lawsuit helps with.

There's another program that we put into action in Montana through the legislature that would

uh, provide private property owners, the ability to create, uh, easements through the block management program.

So they wouldn't have to open up their property to hunting, but they could provide an access corridor to landlocked lands.