Calley Means
π€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Hold on. Okay, sure. Never discussed with me and Casey. Never a discussion with our publishers. Self-centric. I don't know. But but like I would say. you know, that wasn't what we were trying to write about. Like, like we were trying to make, we were trying to write a book for a parent who is totally in the dark about this shit. And we talked about this, that that book could be a gateway to,
Hold on. Okay, sure. Never discussed with me and Casey. Never a discussion with our publishers. Self-centric. I don't know. But but like I would say. you know, that wasn't what we were trying to write about. Like, like we were trying to make, we were trying to write a book for a parent who is totally in the dark about this shit. And we talked about this, that that book could be a gateway to,
I think our book's probably been a gateway for people like probably hopefully going more down the rabbit hole and like listening to your guys' stuff. Like, I think there's a lot of overlap. Like that was the purpose of the book. The purpose of the book is that I read some other books and kind of started going down the rabbit hole and I'm more down the rabbit hole now.
I think our book's probably been a gateway for people like probably hopefully going more down the rabbit hole and like listening to your guys' stuff. Like, I think there's a lot of overlap. Like that was the purpose of the book. The purpose of the book is that I read some other books and kind of started going down the rabbit hole and I'm more down the rabbit hole now.
I think our book's probably been a gateway for people like probably hopefully going more down the rabbit hole and like listening to your guys' stuff. Like, I think there's a lot of overlap. Like that was the purpose of the book. The purpose of the book is that I read some other books and kind of started going down the rabbit hole and I'm more down the rabbit hole now.
So like that book, that was the purpose of the book. it was not a deliberate thing not to mention, but it, again, I think it talks a lot about pharmaceuticals and I do think the book is a gateway, you know, as part of big A, it's happening with many things.
So like that book, that was the purpose of the book. it was not a deliberate thing not to mention, but it, again, I think it talks a lot about pharmaceuticals and I do think the book is a gateway, you know, as part of big A, it's happening with many things.
So like that book, that was the purpose of the book. it was not a deliberate thing not to mention, but it, again, I think it talks a lot about pharmaceuticals and I do think the book is a gateway, you know, as part of big A, it's happening with many things.
So if that book leads people to follow you and, and leads people on a journey, I can tell you, I think it has actually opened the door for a lot of people on a journey and it's not a journey to love vaccines and trust the medical system. Um, so, so that, that, that was the goal, um, on that, as far as what I'm passionate about, like, um, I just can't emphasize this enough.
So if that book leads people to follow you and, and leads people on a journey, I can tell you, I think it has actually opened the door for a lot of people on a journey and it's not a journey to love vaccines and trust the medical system. Um, so, so that, that, that was the goal, um, on that, as far as what I'm passionate about, like, um, I just can't emphasize this enough.
So if that book leads people to follow you and, and leads people on a journey, I can tell you, I think it has actually opened the door for a lot of people on a journey and it's not a journey to love vaccines and trust the medical system. Um, so, so that, that, that was the goal, um, on that, as far as what I'm passionate about, like, um, I just can't emphasize this enough.
I want you guys to get the message out. We should have these conversations. I think the tactical, I think it goes to your point about DC. My personal opinion is you can get a couple big things done. This is my thought. There's gotta be some really big wins that are really visible and really quick on this impugning this idea of our sick care system. And then as wins pile up,
I want you guys to get the message out. We should have these conversations. I think the tactical, I think it goes to your point about DC. My personal opinion is you can get a couple big things done. This is my thought. There's gotta be some really big wins that are really visible and really quick on this impugning this idea of our sick care system. And then as wins pile up,
I want you guys to get the message out. We should have these conversations. I think the tactical, I think it goes to your point about DC. My personal opinion is you can get a couple big things done. This is my thought. There's gotta be some really big wins that are really visible and really quick on this impugning this idea of our sick care system. And then as wins pile up,
There's an 80,000 person department and we can hopefully get good people in there and they can do bureaucratic things to unwind the deep state along with the vague, along with Elon. And I think there's a very optimistic mission there. My personal opinion is if you go day one and tell them to lock everyone out, go to Dynamo, it's actually going to subvert.
There's an 80,000 person department and we can hopefully get good people in there and they can do bureaucratic things to unwind the deep state along with the vague, along with Elon. And I think there's a very optimistic mission there. My personal opinion is if you go day one and tell them to lock everyone out, go to Dynamo, it's actually going to subvert.
There's an 80,000 person department and we can hopefully get good people in there and they can do bureaucratic things to unwind the deep state along with the vague, along with Elon. And I think there's a very optimistic mission there. My personal opinion is if you go day one and tell them to lock everyone out, go to Dynamo, it's actually going to subvert.
I would actually potentially argue, if you want to be conspiratorial, that you're the one that's actually trying to subvert exactly what you're trying to get done.
I would actually potentially argue, if you want to be conspiratorial, that you're the one that's actually trying to subvert exactly what you're trying to get done.
I would actually potentially argue, if you want to be conspiratorial, that you're the one that's actually trying to subvert exactly what you're trying to get done.