Cara Santamaria

It's just misleading people.

Or somebody without expertise, not knowing, not having the skills and the training to read a scientific paper.

You're kidding.

So now, yeah, now it is 1.1%, as opposed to 30%.

Okay, Kara.

I think it's the fish, but for a different reason.

Because in reading this... Okay, so I'll just go through them.

Potential method for reducing atmospheric methane involving volcanic ash and seawater.

Okay.

I don't know what that method could be, but I'm with Evan on the fact that, yeah, you could combine the two when there's an underwater explosion or just maybe...

Somebody happened upon this in some sort of like model.

I have no idea with the material science one.

I hope it's true.

I feel like we need this.

We need to figure out how to reduce the total energy consumption of data centers.

So I can imagine that a lot of very smart people are working on this right now.

The one that does bother me, and it's because of the wording, so I'm just going to read it verbatim here.

In a recent extensive survey of Arctic fish, okay, I buy that, researchers found the first example of a fish, the snailfish, that is able to use its tail fin for backward propulsion.

I cannot imagine that that is true.

And maybe I am misunderstanding fish fins here, but I've seen... Have you ever seen those ghost knife fish?