Cassie Kozyrkov

That is about the information that's going to go into decision making.

I have to understand analytics because that will inspire decision making.

Psychology, I have to understand how humans actually make their decisions.

Economics, also the theory, and the experimental and behavioral, which is very weird, by the way, going from your auction theory class that's all the mathematics of how people should make decisions to your experimental economics class, which is like, they do not make decisions like that.

Humors are pretty weird.

Reading philosophy, taking business school courses.

What else do I got?

I've got neuroeconomics.

I'm going to agree on that.

the neuroscience of decision making, yeah.

So I suffered, I got full immersion.

Please.

And so my belief was, if decision-making is the absolute most important thing, which I believe it is, then how dare we have it be scattered like a bunch of lost toys across all these different disciplines?

How dare we?

We can do better than this.

How dare we?

And particularly when we have things like AI rising up, where

What that is, really, is it is a decision discipline.

But we allow people to see it as something else, as something technical, as something devoid of the human element.

When you've been in AI as long as I have, and you've looked at it from every different angle, and it's like being in that dark room, and you grow up some part, and you're like, this is a curtain.