Charles Piller

We talked about the peer review process improving. Do you think institutions like the major institutions of the world that are performing the scientific research should be also put on notice that they need to improve some things?

We talked about the peer review process improving. Do you think institutions like the major institutions of the world that are performing the scientific research should be also put on notice that they need to improve some things?

Yeah, I mean, I think really you have the The institutions that regulate, fund, publish, and administer science, you've got universities, journals, regulatory agencies like the FDA, funders like the NIH, and foundations that fund important scientific research, they're all guilty of complacency. They're all guilty of not keeping up with the times, not keeping up with the reality,

Yeah, I mean, I think really you have the The institutions that regulate, fund, publish, and administer science, you've got universities, journals, regulatory agencies like the FDA, funders like the NIH, and foundations that fund important scientific research, they're all guilty of complacency. They're all guilty of not keeping up with the times, not keeping up with the reality,

Yeah, I mean, I think really you have the The institutions that regulate, fund, publish, and administer science, you've got universities, journals, regulatory agencies like the FDA, funders like the NIH, and foundations that fund important scientific research, they're all guilty of complacency. They're all guilty of not keeping up with the times, not keeping up with the reality,

that there are pervasive problems in image doctoring and related kinds of falsification of research. So I think taking it seriously is step one. Not just paying lip service, but really developing

that there are pervasive problems in image doctoring and related kinds of falsification of research. So I think taking it seriously is step one. Not just paying lip service, but really developing

that there are pervasive problems in image doctoring and related kinds of falsification of research. So I think taking it seriously is step one. Not just paying lip service, but really developing

methods that are routinely applied in all of those institutions to be able to show the public that they care deeply about honest research research that can be used to move the society forward and not just drug development but other forms of science forward and so yeah i would say you got to hit those institutions hard the institutional authorities of science are behind

methods that are routinely applied in all of those institutions to be able to show the public that they care deeply about honest research research that can be used to move the society forward and not just drug development but other forms of science forward and so yeah i would say you got to hit those institutions hard the institutional authorities of science are behind

methods that are routinely applied in all of those institutions to be able to show the public that they care deeply about honest research research that can be used to move the society forward and not just drug development but other forms of science forward and so yeah i would say you got to hit those institutions hard the institutional authorities of science are behind

They need to improve their game, get their game going on this.

They need to improve their game, get their game going on this.

They need to improve their game, get their game going on this.

Yeah, I think the incentive structure is a good place to start because right now a lot of these institutions are heavily incentivized to just produce massive amounts of research right or wrong, especially if, almost like roulette, it lands on the right number. They can become incredibly wealthy as a result. You mentioned the advancement of science. You write for Science Magazine.

Yeah, I think the incentive structure is a good place to start because right now a lot of these institutions are heavily incentivized to just produce massive amounts of research right or wrong, especially if, almost like roulette, it lands on the right number. They can become incredibly wealthy as a result. You mentioned the advancement of science. You write for Science Magazine.

Yeah, I think the incentive structure is a good place to start because right now a lot of these institutions are heavily incentivized to just produce massive amounts of research right or wrong, especially if, almost like roulette, it lands on the right number. They can become incredibly wealthy as a result. You mentioned the advancement of science. You write for Science Magazine.

Trust the science was a statement that was mentioned quite often over the last five years. People have lost trust in science. What do you think science means to the average person these days? And how can we improve that notion?

Trust the science was a statement that was mentioned quite often over the last five years. People have lost trust in science. What do you think science means to the average person these days? And how can we improve that notion?

Trust the science was a statement that was mentioned quite often over the last five years. People have lost trust in science. What do you think science means to the average person these days? And how can we improve that notion?