Chase Hughes
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And who was the guy that you just had on? I watched it on the plane on the way over here. Dr. What was his name? Stephen Greer? Stephen Greer. Most believable guy I've ever seen from a body language perspective. He is very believable. There's some guys that I think are less credible.
And who was the guy that you just had on? I watched it on the plane on the way over here. Dr. What was his name? Stephen Greer? Stephen Greer. Most believable guy I've ever seen from a body language perspective. He is very believable. There's some guys that I think are less credible.
But if you just look at this release of information, when I see the drones as a behavioral expert, I'm seeing this is a logical expansion of that narrative. This is just the next logical step in a normalization process. So we're normalizing these drones and we're normalizing the aerial phenomenon. And then all of this stuff happening, we don't know what the end goal is.
But if you just look at this release of information, when I see the drones as a behavioral expert, I'm seeing this is a logical expansion of that narrative. This is just the next logical step in a normalization process. So we're normalizing these drones and we're normalizing the aerial phenomenon. And then all of this stuff happening, we don't know what the end goal is.
So if you're looking at a PSYOP, the end goal of all PSYOPs is to modify or shape
So if you're looking at a PSYOP, the end goal of all PSYOPs is to modify or shape
behavior of a crowd of people a group of people so what would be the end result or the desired end result for somebody to shape a behavior of a country or a populace so we want to normalize it but then you got to go into and i'm not going to speculate on this but the next step is why why would this need to be normalized what would the next step after that be
behavior of a crowd of people a group of people so what would be the end result or the desired end result for somebody to shape a behavior of a country or a populace so we want to normalize it but then you got to go into and i'm not going to speculate on this but the next step is why why would this need to be normalized what would the next step after that be
Definitely possible. And I'm always, and I'm not, I'm not, casting aspersions on anybody, but I'm always suspicious if someone's coming out as a whistleblower when they have a list of what I'm allowed to talk about and what I'm not. And when a whistleblower comes out with, oh, I can't talk about that, I'm limited to speak on that, then they have a list of speaking points.
Definitely possible. And I'm always, and I'm not, I'm not, casting aspersions on anybody, but I'm always suspicious if someone's coming out as a whistleblower when they have a list of what I'm allowed to talk about and what I'm not. And when a whistleblower comes out with, oh, I can't talk about that, I'm limited to speak on that, then they have a list of speaking points.
And that makes me a little suspicious.
And that makes me a little suspicious.
Yeah. I'm not going to mention any names, but you'll probably know who I'm talking about. You see somebody that comes out as a whistleblower, and they start talking about all these programs, and a podcast host is going, okay, well, tell me more about are we doing this? Are we doing surgeries on these guys? Do we have these little alien creatures locked in a jar somewhere?
Yeah. I'm not going to mention any names, but you'll probably know who I'm talking about. You see somebody that comes out as a whistleblower, and they start talking about all these programs, and a podcast host is going, okay, well, tell me more about are we doing this? Are we doing surgeries on these guys? Do we have these little alien creatures locked in a jar somewhere?
They're like, oh, I can't mention that. That's the end of the road of what I'm allowed to talk about. They're people with speaking points is what it is.
They're like, oh, I can't mention that. That's the end of the road of what I'm allowed to talk about. They're people with speaking points is what it is.
I believe Stephen Greer. Absolutely. You believe him? Yeah, and I just watched it yesterday when I was flying down here. And I watched the whole entire episode. You've never met Stephen? Never met him. But every time I've seen him talk... He's okay with ambiguity. He's okay saying, I don't know that. We see so many people that are certain about everything. They know the reason. They know the why.
I believe Stephen Greer. Absolutely. You believe him? Yeah, and I just watched it yesterday when I was flying down here. And I watched the whole entire episode. You've never met Stephen? Never met him. But every time I've seen him talk... He's okay with ambiguity. He's okay saying, I don't know that. We see so many people that are certain about everything. They know the reason. They know the why.
They know maybe the star system that some kind of craft came from. They're certain. And I see the more certainty that I see in somebody... the less credible I tend to see them. I'm a little more suspicious, let's just say that. And he is okay with ambiguity and saying, like, I don't know what this is or what it's for, but this is the fact.
They know maybe the star system that some kind of craft came from. They're certain. And I see the more certainty that I see in somebody... the less credible I tend to see them. I'm a little more suspicious, let's just say that. And he is okay with ambiguity and saying, like, I don't know what this is or what it's for, but this is the fact.