Christian Hubicki

And I think that that's part of what we're dealing with is that there was so much enthusiasm and hype of like, oh, my God, look what this thing can do.

It can do anything, quote, unquote, asterisk, caveat.

Right.

And so it's easy to get carried away with that.

And it's like, guys, let's kind of come back down to earth a little bit.

It's amazing, but it's great to see the limits.

Well, when it comes to anything over long distance, like, I mean, it's not audio stuff and not AV stuff, but we're routing cables and robots, shielding and all that stuff and where you're routing the cables by, you know, like all that stuff starts to matter in that kind of thing.

Data fidelity is really important and everything.

But like just when something is so subjective as audio, I mean, I'm just I'm just trained to think that if someone says something, you know, tastes better, I'm almost like to prove it.

The double blind right now.

Not a big topic at all.

Not at all.

But anyway, it's great to be here.

And so I am glad to be back.

Finally, I can now talk about Survivor.

You know, it's an enormous pleasure to get to go on the show.

It's a show that I love ever since I was a kid.

But you can't really talk about it much until the show is over and the show finally finished on May 20th out in Los Angeles when we had the live finale.

But one thing that always drew me to Survivor, there's a lot of things that can draw you to Survivor as a scientist.

And a lot of scientists, in fact, love watching Survivor.