Chuck Todd

but I've in some ways tried to recreate sort of, sort of like, you know, how I always, you know, I always said I wanted to always think about the day two and three story on day one, rather than just living in the day one story.

It kind of follows a cube root and it's about 500.

So at least you say, well, we know this works because other governments kind of run on this formula.

Cause I think we're here to educate.

And when I feel like I've able to do better here than I ever was in NBC.

And it was more about a constraint.

You know, I could, it's not about executive oversight or anything like that.

It was just about

The time constraints, the the sort of stuck in old ways.

Right.

It was no one individual.

It was.

But I feel like I can I feel like with less that I'm that I'm able to sort of both inform and educate.

I think we in the news business don't educate enough.

We do a lot of informing of what's happening, new information, you know, all that stuff.

There are people smarter than me who have argued that you increase the odds, the chance for gerrymandering shenanigans here.

But we're terrible about the context, right?

We don't explain.

I mean, you know, I'm pretty proud of the fact and, you know, some of it's by happenstance.

If you expand and I can argue either side of that, I think broadly speaking, you are going to get more districts where there are more people, which means that I think you counter some of the reason why the electoral college stuff works out is that essentially large rural areas are overrepresented.