Constance Grady

Weinstein is currently facing retrial in New York State. He was found guilty of rape and sexual assault here in 2020. But last year, the verdict was overturned because of a procedural issue.

Weinstein is currently facing retrial in New York State. He was found guilty of rape and sexual assault here in 2020. But last year, the verdict was overturned because of a procedural issue.

Weinstein is currently facing retrial in New York State. He was found guilty of rape and sexual assault here in 2020. But last year, the verdict was overturned because of a procedural issue.

In the 2020 trial, the judge allowed prosecutors to present testimony from women who had accused Weinstein of sexual assault but who weren't pressing charges against him in that trial.

In the 2020 trial, the judge allowed prosecutors to present testimony from women who had accused Weinstein of sexual assault but who weren't pressing charges against him in that trial.

In the 2020 trial, the judge allowed prosecutors to present testimony from women who had accused Weinstein of sexual assault but who weren't pressing charges against him in that trial.

So at the time, the argument was that their testimony would establish a pattern of behavior from Weinstein. But in the appeal last year, the judge was like, if you don't have enough evidence to actually charge him with the specific crimes that these women say he committed, then you really just shouldn't be presenting testimony about it at all.

So at the time, the argument was that their testimony would establish a pattern of behavior from Weinstein. But in the appeal last year, the judge was like, if you don't have enough evidence to actually charge him with the specific crimes that these women say he committed, then you really just shouldn't be presenting testimony about it at all.

So at the time, the argument was that their testimony would establish a pattern of behavior from Weinstein. But in the appeal last year, the judge was like, if you don't have enough evidence to actually charge him with the specific crimes that these women say he committed, then you really just shouldn't be presenting testimony about it at all.

So now the whole trial has been invalidated and they're doing it over again without that corroborating testimony.

So now the whole trial has been invalidated and they're doing it over again without that corroborating testimony.

So now the whole trial has been invalidated and they're doing it over again without that corroborating testimony.

In a lot of ways, she is making a very similar argument to the one his lawyers are making.

In a lot of ways, she is making a very similar argument to the one his lawyers are making.

In a lot of ways, she is making a very similar argument to the one his lawyers are making.

They both involve a lot of just like the most spurious bad faith possible interpretations of everything that the women accusing Weinstein have done.

They both involve a lot of just like the most spurious bad faith possible interpretations of everything that the women accusing Weinstein have done.

They both involve a lot of just like the most spurious bad faith possible interpretations of everything that the women accusing Weinstein have done.

Candace Owens has basically two central arguments in Weinstein's defense. The first one is 130 women.

Candace Owens has basically two central arguments in Weinstein's defense. The first one is 130 women.