Corey DeAngelis
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
They find that it spends a lot of money, and they don't improve outcomes. Most of the results are null results.
I don't think that was the RCT, though. I think that was more of like a regression with controls. Could be.
I don't think that was the RCT, though. I think that was more of like a regression with controls. Could be.
I don't think that was the RCT, though. I think that was more of like a regression with controls. Could be.
And the latest pre-K evaluation statewide was in Tennessee. Yeah, when was that? That was a few years ago. They followed them through sixth grade. Oh, yeah. And it was a randomized control trial. They found that those who won the lottery were worse off academically and behaviorally by the end of sixth grade. Okay, won the lottery meaning...
And the latest pre-K evaluation statewide was in Tennessee. Yeah, when was that? That was a few years ago. They followed them through sixth grade. Oh, yeah. And it was a randomized control trial. They found that those who won the lottery were worse off academically and behaviorally by the end of sixth grade. Okay, won the lottery meaning...
And the latest pre-K evaluation statewide was in Tennessee. Yeah, when was that? That was a few years ago. They followed them through sixth grade. Oh, yeah. And it was a randomized control trial. They found that those who won the lottery were worse off academically and behaviorally by the end of sixth grade. Okay, won the lottery meaning...
You won a lottery to get a scholarship to go to pre-K relative to the families who lost the lottery and stayed with their parents.
You won a lottery to get a scholarship to go to pre-K relative to the families who lost the lottery and stayed with their parents.
You won a lottery to get a scholarship to go to pre-K relative to the families who lost the lottery and stayed with their parents.
Maybe because the parents have an advantage at raising their own kids. Maybe they're better at disciplining the kids at home.
Maybe because the parents have an advantage at raising their own kids. Maybe they're better at disciplining the kids at home.
Maybe because the parents have an advantage at raising their own kids. Maybe they're better at disciplining the kids at home.
But you're saying that the more recent- The more recent Tennessee experiment, which is the latest one, RCT, negative effects on academics and behavior through sixth grade, which is the last year of the study. And I'd also say on the teenage pregnancy thing, that's another important outcome that we looked at in our follow-up crime study that was published in the Journal of Private Enterprise.
But you're saying that the more recent- The more recent Tennessee experiment, which is the latest one, RCT, negative effects on academics and behavior through sixth grade, which is the last year of the study. And I'd also say on the teenage pregnancy thing, that's another important outcome that we looked at in our follow-up crime study that was published in the Journal of Private Enterprise.
But you're saying that the more recent- The more recent Tennessee experiment, which is the latest one, RCT, negative effects on academics and behavior through sixth grade, which is the last year of the study. And I'd also say on the teenage pregnancy thing, that's another important outcome that we looked at in our follow-up crime study that was published in the Journal of Private Enterprise.
We found a reduction in crime, but also a 38% reduction in paternity disputes, which could be caused by out-of-wedlock births or teenage pregnancies. And we also had a โ there is an RCT. That was with Choice. That was with a voucher program in Milwaukee. That one was not an RCT. We did the best we could with โ we even controlled for neighborhood and single-parent households and religiosity.
We found a reduction in crime, but also a 38% reduction in paternity disputes, which could be caused by out-of-wedlock births or teenage pregnancies. And we also had a โ there is an RCT. That was with Choice. That was with a voucher program in Milwaukee. That one was not an RCT. We did the best we could with โ we even controlled for neighborhood and single-parent households and religiosity.
We found a reduction in crime, but also a 38% reduction in paternity disputes, which could be caused by out-of-wedlock births or teenage pregnancies. And we also had a โ there is an RCT. That was with Choice. That was with a voucher program in Milwaukee. That one was not an RCT. We did the best we could with โ we even controlled for neighborhood and single-parent households and religiosity.
All the โ as many demographics as you could get to control for. But another separate study in New York City was a charter school experiment by Roland Fryer and his co-author, published in the Journal of Political Economy, I believe in 2015.