Cory

We talked about it with Logan.

We've talked about it with a few other people.

It's this idea that, you know, for people who are really good, there's going to be a lot of opportunity around those things.

But I, I think a thing that is a legitimate concern is what does that mean for entry level people?

Like it, it is true that there's going to be more experienced cleanup needed that, uh, you know, your real, uh,

ideators that are able to do the big tasks are going to be probably just fine for a good long time but what happens when we have a smaller entry level funnel of people you know what's the long term effect of that and do you think this is a fair question do you think there will be a need for just as many entry level engineers as there are today like

Or as there were three years ago?

Yeah, exactly.

The truth of the matter.

The one thing I would say is that I think that's a really interesting macro look.

My one...

Not criticism, but area where I kind of fall off is that, you know, like, yes, these people here, we're going to do other cool things.

And these jobs will be replaced by these jobs.

But that doesn't mean Tom, the software engineer, is going to become Tom, the banker.

Like, Tom is still screwed.

Well, other people will shift into these new areas.

I mean, like as a grant on the grand scale, there, there, there is this shift, but how do you, how do you, and, and, and software engineering was a bad example as was probably banking, but that was just spitting out ideas, but like whose job, let's say it this way.

The person a, whose job is deleted over here is,

Yeah.

And is there a new skill set directly adjacent to the one you have that is an obvious transition?