Dan Epps

I think that's pretty garland.

Or would Justice Thomas actually give you the full benefit of, like, the criminal... So you mean, like, when is it a criminal case or when is it a civil case?

Like, for purposes of criminal procedures?

But they're just, they're acting and they're stepping into the shoes of the United States.

I don't know.

Yeah, that's interesting.

I don't think we're going to answer that question today because I'm about out of time.

Ask your students during office hours.

We'll see if we get there.

All right.

Well, thanks very much for listening.

If you like the show, please rate and review on your podcast app of choice.

Visit the website, dividedargument.com, for transcripts.

Blog.dividedargument.com for commentary from the wider extended Divided Argument universe.

Store.dividedargument.com for merchandise.

Send us an email, pod at dividedargument.com, and leave us a voicemail, 314-649-3790.

And if there's a long delay between this and our next episode, it will be because it has been determined we have issued too many frivolous episodes and we are barred from filing further episodes.

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast.

I'm Dan Epps.

And I said, tomorrow.