Dan Epps

So as I read it, the...

majority opinion by the chief is going to take a pretty broad approach to standing in cases like this.

And in fact, you know, that's why I said something and then took it back a second ago, because I think under this broad approach that we'll describe, it really opens the door to a lot of potential lawsuits by candidates like this.

And then you have the question.

Well, until...

But if you wait even longer and the election happens and you lose, certainly if the candidate loses by the margin of the late received votes, I mean, Purcell is not in play at that point.

They could go back and say, I should be declared the winner, right?

But also, you know, recognizing federal constitutional arguments in doing so, right?

The court says it's the interest in a fair election.

Okay.

Right?

That there's some sort of process value and...

And that is also a public thing, right?

That does seem a little different than just saying it's unfortunate that TransUnion had in their, you know, file cabinet stuff about me that is not good.

Right.

If TransUnion had just been like putting on its website, you know, vote is a credit risk.

Yeah.

That does seem different, right?

You have an interest in not...

I think... Not having people think of you as that, even if you're not seeking credit, right?