Dan Epps

I mean, certainly it's less a court of error correction than it was like 50 years ago, right?

Relative to 2016, 2006, 1996, 1986.

You think on the merits docket that's the case?

Or just on the interim docket?

Could we get somebody to do some empirics on that, just to go through and code cases?

I wouldn't say they've become less of one, but...

I don't know.

I mean, we're seeing – I feel like we used to see more routine summary reversals.

I guess I feel like that claim is right if it's a case involving the government or it's a case involving an executive branch policy.

I don't know whether I would agree that it's right as a matter of course.

If it's a case involving any politically charged issue.

Okay, yeah.

Guns, speech, girls, whatever.

Okay, that might be true.

It's always interesting to see one justice kind of going out on their own, kind of staking out a different kind of unique position.

Obviously, this isn't persuading the rest of the court.

I'm not sure this is going to make any meaningful difference.

But, you know, I think it's good for people to be thinking about the court's procedures and be like, is this the right way to do it?

Great.

Okay, one down.