Dan Epps

We've got, in theory, we've got three majority opinions to talk about.

Can we do it?

Should we start with Coney Island because we've talked about that one before?

Yes, we've been.

And it is the shortest.

Well, no, no, no.

Whether it has to be done within a reasonable time.

Whether it has to be done within a reasonable time.

Which is seemingly what the rule says.

Yep.

Yeah.

And I, you know, I guess one, one question that we sort of toyed with, I mean, I think when we talked about the argument, we felt pretty confident that the court was going to say the reasonable time requirement applies.

It's going to side with the Lisa Blatt argument.

And, you know, one question I toyed with was, you know, could a different advocate have made a difference?

Maybe.

Maybe could have kind of threaded the needle in a certain way, tried to get the court, you know, here the court says, you know, this has to be, this reasonable time requirement does apply contra the argument applied.

of the respondent that it just doesn't apply, basically, that you can always challenge, avoid judgment.

Maybe a better advocate could have gotten the court to say more about like,

the breadth of a reasonable time requirement.

Like something more helpful on remand.