Dan Epps

Like, yes, it applies, but like 100 years is reasonable if it's a void judgment or something like that.

I mean, they wouldn't say that.

All of which is sort of left for another case.

Yeah.

Now, I mean, you said, you know, you're right.

Justice Sotomayor says let's not resolve the due process issue.

I mean, I felt like reading this is on page four, reading the majority opinion, the court was like basically deciding it, but like not 100 percent said giving a party a reasonable time to seek relief from an allegedly void judgment may well be all the due process demands.

Right.

Doesn't that suggest it's at least possible that due process demands more?

Well.

It is hard to accept the proposition that due process requires such a regime.

And it says that after pointing to some other examples, you know, sort of saying, look, if you if this were right, you know, there could be no time limits for appealing a void judgment and no time limits for seeking cert.

It is hard to accept the proposition that due process requires such a regime.

So I don't know.

Well, maybe that argument wasn't sufficiently argued.

And with the benefit of further briefing.

I mean, they certainly look.

I mean, I would not feel great if I was an advocate of the due process position.

I just, you know, I thought the court was a little bit

Yeah, I mean, if there is a due process concern, you might interpret reasonable to be very generous in this one context.